Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hamilton, 676 So. 2d 1081.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kendell Myles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
7/2/96), Matute, 23-0054, p. 7, at 170.
State of Louisiana v. Cruz Matute La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.T. La. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Newton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/2/96), the Louisiana Supreme Court speaks of the “automatic and irreversible divestiture of jurisdiction from the juvenile court to the district court” under LSA-Ch.C.
State v. Newton 129 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Moreover, in State v. Hamilton, 96-0107 (La.7/2/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court speaks of the “automatic and irreversible divestiture of jurisdiction from the juvenile court to the district court” under LSA-Ch.C.
State v. Flores 66 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hamilton, 96-0107 (La.7/2/96), .
State Ex Rel. Tc 35 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hamilton , 96-0107 p. 2 (La.7/2/96), .
State ex rel. T.C. 35 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hamilton, 96-0107 p. 2 (La.7/2/96), .
State v. Jacobs 904 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
See State v. Hamilton, 96-0107 (La.7/2/96), .
State v. Dawson 775 So. 2d 1046 La. 2000
Additionally, State v. Hamilton:, 96-0107, p. 1 (La.7/2/96), , does not address this issue in a controverted case.
State ex rel. Jackson 757 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
The court in State v. Hamilton, 96-0107 (La.7/2/96), discussed this issue at length: Under La.Ch.C.
State v. Ste. Marie 723 So. 2d 407 La. 1998
See State v. Hamilton, 96-0107 (La.7/2/96), (failure of the state to decide within 30 days of juvenile's arrest whether to file in district court or juvenile court as required by La.Ch.C.
State v. Taylor 716 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See State v. Hamilton, 96-0107, p. 2 (La.7/2/96), .
State v. Taylor 716 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See State v. Hamilton, 96-0107, p. 2 (La.7/2/96), .
State v. Dixon 712 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In its brief the State relies on State v. Hamilton, 96-0107 (La.7/2/96), , for its argument that La.