DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 676 So. 2d 552.

19 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald P. Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
    6/28/96), State v. Dorthey, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joey Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    6/28/96), ], where we set out guidelines for when and under what circumstances courts should exercise their discretion under [State v.] Dorthey [] to declare excessive a minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wayne Kevin Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95)
  • State v. Jones 107 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), ; State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), ; State v. *865 Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ; State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), ; State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), ; State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Travis Bourda La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95)
  • State v. BOURDA 70 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), ; State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), ; State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ; State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), ; State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), ; State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Carol Wayne Crooks, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95)
  • State v. Vincent 56 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , the Court recognized Dorthe y limited holding: We held [in State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ] that “[a] court may only depart from the minimum sentence if it finds that there is clear and convincing evidence in the particular ease before it which would rebut [the] presumption of constitutionality” and emphasized that “departures downward from the minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law should occur
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven Mark Marc" Anderson " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95)
  • State v. Anderson 48 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), ; State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), ; State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ; State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), ; State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), ; State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.l1/27/95), .
  • State v. Brown 821 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), ; State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), ; State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ; State v. Gordon, 96-0427 *755 (La.5/10/96), ; State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), ; State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. King 804 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), ; State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), ; State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ; State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), ; State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), ; State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), ; State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), ; State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ; State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), ; State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), ; State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Lindsey 770 So. 2d 339 La. 2000
    See, e.g., State v. Handy, 96-2505 (La.1/5/97), ; State v. Bastian, 96-2453 (La.12/13/96), ; State v. Randleston, 96-1646 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Wilson, 96-1600 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ; State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), ; State v. Kelly, 95-2335 (La.2/2/96), ; State v. Lombard, 95-2107 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 672 La. 1998
    State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), .
  • State v. Keys 694 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ; State v. Gordon, 96-0427 (La.5/10/96), .
  • State v. Johnson 693 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), .
  • State v. Ard 686 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Subsequently, in State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), , the Supreme Court explained that a sentencing departure under Dorthey requires not only a factual showing of why the mandatory minimum would be constitutionally excessive, but a further justification for the amount of reduction in the sentence actually imposed.
  • State v. Morgan 680 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to Dorthey by saying, “Louisiana’s judiciary maintains the distinct responsibility of reviewing sentences imposed in criminal eases for constitutional excessiveness.