Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hongo, 706 So. 2d 419.

70 citing documents.

State v. Hotard 994 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/2/97), wherein the supreme court held that an erroneous jury instruction which improperly included “intent to inflict great bodily harm” in an attempted second degree murder case was subject to harmless error analysis.
State v. Falcon 956 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 4 (La.12/02/97), , ftn.
State v. Cooper 935 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See State v. Hongo, 96-2060, pp. 4-6 (La.12/02/97), -22 .
State v. Wiley 880 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[23] State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 2 (La.12/2/97), ; State v. Mitchell , XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Bishop 835 So. 2d 434 La. 2003
96-2060 (La.12/02/97), .
State v. Grainer 834 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Hongo, 96-2060 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Hongo, 96-2060 (La.12/02/97)
State v. Lewis 793 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Mitchell 808 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In addition, the Louisiana Supreme Court held, in State v. Hongo, 96-2060, pp. 4-5 (La.12/2/97), -22 , that even when the final jury instructions contain the misstatement of law complained of here, the error is harmless when the record shows that there was sufficient evidence from which a jury could conclude that the defendant had the requisite specific intent.
State v. Woods 787 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 2 (La.12/02/97), ; -93 (La.
State v. Wilson 773 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 5 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Mitchell 772 So. 2d 78 La. 2000
State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 2 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Thomas 750 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 5 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Mitchell 745 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 2 (La.12/2/97), ; State v. Brunet, 95-0340, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
State v. Robinson 744 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Jackson 733 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 5 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
See State v. Hongo, 96-2060 (La.12/2/97), (by definition, any error which does not constitute a structural defect in the proceedings is subject to harmless-error analysis and also subject to the contemporaneous objection rule); see also Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 , 107 S.Ct.
State v. Causey 721 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 5 (La.12/2/97), .
Jefferson v. Lafreniere Park Foundation 720 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2078, 2081 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Hongo, 96-2060 (La.12/2/97), .