DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guy, 679 So. 2d 102.

57 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Fitzpatrick P. Williams La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    9/ 13/ 96), observing that the victim was killed by only a single bullet, when defendant fired three shots at the victim' s car after the victim honked his horn at defendant, did not negate the fact that defendant intentionally aimed and fired three shots in close succession directly at the victim); State v. Kennington, 51
  • State Of Louisiana v. Jason W. Thomas La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    9/ 13/ 96), ( though he objected on other grounds, defendant' s failure to object contemporaneously to hearsay precludes review of hearsay issue on appeal).
  • State v. Turner 267 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Bryant Lakeith Bethley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Bryant Lakeith Bethley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Bethley 107 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 12/6/95) , , writ denied, 96-89 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Bethley 107 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 12/6/95) , , writ denied, 96-89 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Lester Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    9/13/96), this court stated: When an appellate court examines sufficiency of evidence, the standard of review is whether, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there was proof of each element o
  • State v. Leger 907 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 12/6/95), , writ denied, 96-89 (La.9/13/96), , this court stated: When an appellate court examines sufficiency of evidence, the standard of review is whether, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there was proof of each element of the crime.
  • State v. Galle 904 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. William Odell Cash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    9/13/96), (citation omitted).
  • State v. Cash 861 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 12/6/95), , writ denied, 96-0089 (La.9/13/96), (citation omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Arthur Major III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Major 857 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 12/6/95), , writ denied, 96-89 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Karam 834 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 12/6/95); , writ denied, 96-0089 (La.9/13/96); , a panel of this court stated the following regarding reasonable hypotheses of innocence presented by a defendant: "If a case involves circumstantial evidence, and a rational trier of fact reasonably rejects the defendant's hypothesis of innocence, that hypothesis fails; and unless another one creates reasonable doub
  • State v. LeBlanc 819 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 12/6/95), at 1121 , writ denied, 96-0089 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Goldston 804 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Coston 800 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Wisely 780 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Robinson, 32,794 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/00), ; State v. Guy, 95-0899 (La.App.4th Cir.1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Carter 782 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir.1/31/96), , writ denied, this Court considered a case where a defendant convicted of second degree murder argued the excessiveness of the sentence, and this Court stated: When a trial judge determines a sentence from a carefully tailored penalty statute, such as La.
  • State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Banks 779 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Moore 777 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Jason 779 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Commodore 774 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.1/31/96), , writ denied 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Wilson 773 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.1/31/96), -27 , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Baker 772 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Echols 774 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Ventry 765 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Reynolds 772 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 12/6/95); , writ denied, 96-89 (La.9/13/96)
  • State v. Lee 764 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Dupart 769 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 th Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Sherman 761 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , 669 So.2d *662 517, 526 , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Prater 762 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Laymon 756 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Jenkins 759 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 th Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Robinson 754 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Sarkozy 755 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Thomas 752 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99), , writ denied, 99-1702 (La.11/5/99), ; State v. Guy, 95-0899 (La.App.4 Cir.1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Anderson 753 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    App. 4 Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Jefferson 735 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Guillard 736 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4th Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Smith 737 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 12/6/95); , writ denied, 96-0089 (La.9/13/96); , “If a case involves circumstantial evidence, and a rational trier of fact reasonably rejects the defendant’s hypothesis of innocence, that hypothesis fails; and unless another one creates reasonable doubt, the defendant is guilty.” Defendant contends in brief that “the jury’s verdict of guilty to conspiracy to commi
  • State v. Jones 731 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    App. 4 Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), .
  • State v. Montgomery 734 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Johnson 719 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Dickerson 708 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Labostrie 702 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4th Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), , we found that the issue of relevancy is intertwined with the hearsay issue.