Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Everidge, 702 So. 2d 680.

43 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gary Allen La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Brittany Linn Estes La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Melanie Barnett Curtin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.H.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Travionne Bradley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), (“A reviewing court must find beyond a reasonable doubt that excluded evidence could not have affected the jury’s verdict for the error to be harmless.”) (citing State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 25 (La.11/20/94), ).
State v. Jinks 267 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), , 685 (" A reviewing court must find beyond a reasonable doubt that excluded evidence could not have affected the jury's verdict for the error to be harmless."
State v. Pittman 244 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
State v. Moody 178 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Everidge, 96-2666 (La.12/2/97)
State v. Hatfield 155 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/4/13), (quoting State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 7 (La.12/2/97), ).
State v. Martin 131 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 802 provides that “[hjearsay is not admissible except as otherwise provided by this Code or other legislation.” “Hearsay is excluded because the value of the statement rests on the credibility of the out-of-court asserter who is not subject to cross-examination and other safeguards of reliability.” State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 7 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Adams 119 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), (citations omitted).
State v. Hugle 104 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“Hearsay is excluded because the value of the statement rests on the credi *615 bility of the out-of-court asserter who is not subject to cross-examination and other safeguards of reliability.” State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 7 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Placide 109 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
12/2/97), ; State v. Davis, 05-987, p. 15 (La.App.
State v. Authier 92 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Myers 981 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), -84 (La.
State v. Taylor 973 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
2078, 2081-82 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), ; State v. Davis, 05-987, p. 15 (La.App.
State v. Delaney 965 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Delaney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State v. Everidge, 96-2647, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Legendre 942 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 7 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Davis 930 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
2078, 2081-82 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), ; State v. Quatrevingt, 93-1644 (La.2/28/96), ; State v. Johnson, 94-1379 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Burbank 917 So. 2d 1082 La. 2005
State v. Owunta, 99-1569 at 5 (La.5/26/00), (citing State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), ).
State v. Weber 834 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 801(C); State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 7 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Dangerfield 816 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
art. 801(C); State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Hayes 806 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a defendant is deprived of his defense and a fair trial where the court erroneously excludes witness testimony that would have substantially helped the defense.
State v. Lewis 782 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 7/21/99) , ; State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Shaw 785 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
art. 921; State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Owunta 761 So. 2d 528 La. 2000
See State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), ("A reviewing court must find beyond a reasonable doubt that excluded evidence could not have affected the jury's verdict for the error to be harmless.") (citing State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 25 (La.11/20/94), ).
State v. Norman 756 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[17] State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), ; See also LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Dauzart 749 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
[16] Quoting State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of balancing a defendant's constitutional right to present a defense against the victim's interests under the "rape shield" law, stating: A defendant's right to present a defense is sanctioned constitutionally and he can testify to or give evidence on any matter releva
State v. Hotoph 750 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Smith 743 So. 2d 199 La. 1999
State v. Everidge, 96-2647 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Brooks 758 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
art. 921; State v. Everidge, 96-2665, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Handy 732 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
2 The Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a conviction in State v. Everidge, 96-2665, 96-2647 (La.12/2/97), , because the exclusion of the evidence 17of the victim’s prior sexual activity was not harmless error.
State v. Cangelosi 722 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Calloway 718 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
In State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a defendant is deprived of his defense and a fair trial where the court erroneously excludes witness testimony that would have substantially helped the defense.
State v. Smith 710 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
art. 801; State v. Everidge, 96-KO-2647, 96-K-2665 (La.12/2/97), .
State v. Harris 711 So. 2d 266 La. 1998
State v. Quatrevingt, 93-1644, p. 16 (La.2/28/96), ; State v. Everidge, 96-2647, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), ; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 p. 5 (La.1/14/97), .