Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vale, 699 So. 2d 876.

21 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tracy Wayne Bowie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bowie 101 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Vale, 96-2953 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Bradley 995 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
2078, 2081 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993)), rehearing granted in part on other grounds (La.3/14/08); Vale, 96-2953, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Burbank 893 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
However, the Supreme Court reversed, citing State v. Vale, 96-2953 (La.9/19/97), , and found that "foreclosing cross-examination of Scott on her expectations for her own case ...
State of Louisiana v. Kiley M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Williams 878 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Vale, 96-2953 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Allen 876 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
In State v. Vale, 96-2953 (La.9/19/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that in order for a reviewing court to find that an error in a case is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, the court must find that the verdict actually rendered in that particular trial was "surely unattributable to the error."
State v. Burbank 872 So. 2d 1049 La. 2004
By foreclosing cross-examination of Scott on her expectations for her own case, *1051 the trial court unduly "restricted the inquiry into the witness's motive and interest in testifying for the state and thereby frustrated an `important function of the constitutionally protected right of cross-examination.'" State v. Vale, 96-2953, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), (quoting Vale, 95-0577 at 4, 666 So.2d at 1072 ).
State v. Bentley 844 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
2078, 2081 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Vale, 96-2953, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), ; -85 (La.1993).
State v. Clark 828 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Snyder, 98-1078, p. 15 (La.4/14/99), ; State v. Vale, 96-2953, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Coleman 828 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993): State v. Vale, 96-2953 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Vale, 96-2953, 97-0158, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), , citing State v.Code, -85 (La.1993) (quoting Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Lewis 800 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Sullivan v. Louisiana; State v. Vale, 96-2953, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), ; State v.Code, -85 (La.1993).
State v. Robinson 784 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
2078, 2081 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Vale, 96-2953, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), ; State v.Code, -85 (La.1993), cert.
State v. Lee 747 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
2078, 2081 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Vale, 96-2953, p.2 (La.9/19/97), ; State v.Code, -85 (La.1993), cert.
State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Vale, 96-2953, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), ; State v. Richardson , 96-2598 at p. 5, 703 So.2d at 1373 .
State v. Finch 730 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
See State v. Vale, 96-2953, 97-0158, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Buffington 731 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Vale, 96-2953, 97-0158, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. LeBlanc 719 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Vale, 96-2953, 97-0158, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), , -85 (La.1993) (quoting Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Atkins 713 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
"Before a reviewing court may declare an error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt it must find that the verdict `actually rendered in this trial was surely unattributable to the error.'" State v. Vale, 96-2953, 97-0158, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), , citing State v. Code -85 (La.1993) (quoting Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Richardson 703 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Our Supreme Court recently reaffirmed the harmless error standard in State v. Vale, 96-KO-2953 (La.9/19/97), .