Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Deloch v. Whitley, 684 So. 2d 349.

135 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana La. 2024
See Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), (“Counsel must assert the equal protection claim in a pre-trial motion to quash or waive any complaint in that regard”)).
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(See also Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/96), (per curiam), where the Supreme Court found that defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to quash the indictment based on the allegedly discriminatory selection of grand jury forepersons waived petitioner's equal protection claim.)
State v. TSOLAINOS 997 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
11/22/96), ; see also State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.4/14/98), .
State ex rel. Green v. State 955 So. 2d 679 La. 2007
See, e.q., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Foster v. State 940 So. 2d 656 La. 2006
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Barnes v. State 939 So. 2d 357 La. 2006
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Barnes v. State 939 So. 2d 362 La. 2006
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-65 (6th Cir.1998).
State v. Crandell 924 So. 2d 122 La. 2006
See Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ("Counsel must assert" his complaint about grand jury selection "in a pre-trial motion to *134 quash or waive any complaint in that regard."); see also Francis v. Henderson, 425 U.S. 536 , 96 S.Ct.
State ex rel. Williams v. State 924 So. 2d 148 La. 2006
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Smith v. State 917 So. 2d 1098 La. 2005
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Magee v. State 916 So. 2d 158 La. 2005
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Brown v. State 916 So. 2d 138 La. 2005
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Charles v. State 908 So. 2d 647 La. 2005
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Looney v. State 908 So. 2d 672 La. 2005
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
is unconstitutional per se, or alternatively, susceptible to abuse so as to deny the relator his right to equal protection and due process of law by systemically excluding African-Americans from service on the grand jury; (2) the indictment is invalid because the grand jurors were selected pursuant to unconstitutional local laws; (3) the procedural bar of Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/06), , cannot withstand judicial scrutiny; (4) counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to qu
State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
is unconstitutional per se, or alternatively, susceptible to abuse so as to deny the relator his right to equal protection and due process of law by systemically excluding African-Americans from service on the grand jury; (2) the indictment is invalid because the grand jurors were selected pursuant to unconstitutional local laws; (3) the procedural bar of Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/06), , cannot withstand judicial scrutiny; (4) counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to qu
State ex rel. Pansy v. State 897 So. 2d 595 La. 2005
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Henderson v. State 894 So. 2d 1135 La. 2005
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Smith v. State 896 So. 2d 18 La. 2005
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), .
State ex rel. Williams v. State 888 So. 2d 187 La. 2004
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
Carter v. Cain 887 So. 2d 466 La. 2004
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Washington v. State 885 So. 2d 1127 La. 2004
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Williams v. State 885 So. 2d 1130 La. 2004
See e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State v. Myers 888 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/96), .
State ex rel. Badon v. State 883 So. 2d 1001 La. 2004
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Fritz v. State 882 So. 2d 599 La. 2004
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Collins v. State 882 So. 2d 600 La. 2004
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Pipkins v. State 877 So. 2d 131 La. 2004
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Green v. State 877 So. 2d 135 La. 2004
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Braggs v. State 876 So. 2d 821 La. 2004
See e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. James v. State 876 So. 2d 824 La. 2004
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998)
State ex rel. Breaux v. State 876 So. 2d 793 La. 2004
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Batiste v. State 874 So. 2d 165 La. 2004
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Benedict v. State 874 So. 2d 166 La. 2004
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State v. Hayes 865 So. 2d 692 La. 2004
See Deloche v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), .
State v. Greco 862 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Deloach v. Whitley, 96-1901, pp. 1-2 (La.11/22/96), , where the Court stated: |17AI1[ 1 ] equal protection claims arising out of the selection or composition of grand juries in Louisiana remain subject to this state’s procedural requirements.
State ex rel. Moser v. State 855 So. 2d 751 La. 2003
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Jett v. State 845 So. 2d 1062 La. 2003
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Jackson v. State 842 So. 2d 393 La. 2003
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; See also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State v. Bradford 846 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
In Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court made clear that an equal protection claim based upon discriminatory selection of the grand jury foreman is barred if the defendant fails to file a pretrial motion to quash saying: All equal protection claims arising out of the selection or composition of grand juries in Louisiana remain s
State ex rel. Williams v. State 840 So. 2d 531 La. 2003
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State v. Hall 843 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 *495 (La.11/22/96), ; State v. Brooks, 98-0693 (La.App.
State ex rel. Cooley v. State 839 So. 2d 28 La. 2003
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Billiot v. Cain 837 So. 2d 626 La. 2003
See, e.g., State v. Deloche, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Williams v. State 831 So. 2d 979 La. 2002
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 .
Robertson v. CADDO PARISH, LA. 833 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/96), ; State v. White, 193 La.
State ex rel. Hoffpauir v. State 829 So. 2d 1041 La. 2002
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Coleman v. State 824 So. 2d 1182 La. 2002
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Hardy v. State 823 So. 2d 943 La. 2002
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 362-55 (6th Cir.1998).
State ex rel. Brown v. State 822 So. 2d 614 La. 2002
See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), ; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by