Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., 289 So. 2d 192.
-
Keith v. Bearden
488 So. 2d 1071
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Brady v. Slay
460 So. 2d 732
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Avondale Shipyard Inc. v. LaRose Shipyards, Inc., (La.App.
-
Barbay v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
454 So. 2d 181
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Brasseaux v. Reaux
394 So. 2d 688
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.
-
Sibley v. Menard
398 So. 2d 590
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
See Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Bourg Dry Dock & Service Co. v. Lombas Industries, Inc.
393 So. 2d 203
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1st Cir. 1971): “* * * An orderly disposition of each case and of the entire docket and the avoidance of surprise are inherent in the theory of pre-trial procedure and are sufficient reasons for allowing the trial judge to require adherence to the pre-trial order in the conduct of an action.” See: Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Lupo v. Lupo
392 So. 2d 150
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Mauboules v. Broussard Rice Mills
379 So. 2d 1196
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Avondale Shipyard, Inc. v. LaRose Shipyard, Inc., (La.
-
Pace v. Reasing Rivers Const. Co., Inc.
377 So. 2d 530
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Moity v. Busch
368 So. 2d 1134
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Cobb
366 So. 2d 994
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Jackson v. East Baton Rouge Par. Sch. Bd.
348 So. 2d 739
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
George Engine Co. v. Southern Shipbuilding Corp.
349 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Such damages are awarded when it appears that “the appeal was taken solely for the purpose of delay or that the counsel does not seriously believe in the position taken by him on the appeal.” Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.
-
Franklin v. Franklin
338 So. 2d 1199
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
App. 3rd Cir. 1975); Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Larose Shipyard, Inc., (La.App.