Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thompson, 32 La. Ann. 796.
-
State v. Alford
65 So. 548
La. 1914
where a settlement was- made after the indictment and arrest of the defendant: “The receipt, given subsequent to the indictment and arrest, could not affect the guilt or innocence of the accused on the charge for which he was indicted; it was wholly irrelevant; and therefore there was no error in the ruling of
-
State v. Adam
42 So. 427
La. 1906
It gave the jury no information to which they were not entitled, and, even after retiring, the jury might have returned into the court and requested that the evidence be read over to them.” See, also, .