Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cooper v. United Southern Assurance Co., 718 So. 2d 1029.

18 citing documents.

The Lathan Company v. State of Louisiana, Department of Education, Recovery School District and John White in his … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 1 st Cir. 9/ 9/ 98), : We take this opportunity to remind all counsel that as attorneys and officers of the court, they are required to " conduct [ themselves] at all times with decorum, and in a manner consistent with the dignity and authority of the court and the role which they] should play in
Murray v. Windmann 274 So. 3d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 1 Cir. 9/9/98), ; Kelly v. Riles , 99-601 (La.
Van Buren v. Minor 247 So. 3d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Marie v. Allstate Insurance Co. 224 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Bush v. Mid-South Baking Co. 194 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Stevenson v. Serth 169 So. 3d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Johnson v. Morehouse General Hospital 27 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Terrance v. Dow Chemical Co. 971 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Breitenbach v. Stroud 959 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Graves v. Riverwood Intern. Corp. 949 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Sims v. Ward 938 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. IN. v. Ford Motor Co. 925 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Michelle Detraz v. Victor Lee D/B/A Virgin Nails La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 9/9/98), the first circuit stated: “The issue of whether plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of [the Housley] presumption is factual and is 14 subject to the manifest error standard of review.
Detraz v. Lee 900 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 9/9/98), , the first circuit stated: "The issue of whether plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of [the Housley ] presumption is factual and is subject to the manifest error standard of review.
Seitz v. Scofield 812 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 9/9/98) , , the First Circuit noted: This [Housley] presumption is rebuttable, and the causal link can be broken if the opposition successfully rebuts plaintiffs evidence.
Emery v. Owens-Corporation 813 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1st Cir.9/9/98), ; see also Caballero v. Catholic Mut.
Crawford v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF LA. 770 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000