Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Robertson v. Northshore Regional Medical Center, 723 So. 2d 460.

30 citing documents.

ASP Enterprises, Inc. v. Guillory 22 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Monterrey Center, LLC v. Ed.ucation Partners, Inc. 5 So. 3d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Distinguished Lilly v. Allied Health Care 991 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Input/Output, Inc. v. WILSON GREATBATCH 977 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Mitchell v. Kenner Regional Medical Center 951 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Sanders v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc. 867 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Duzon v. Stallworth 866 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Hoag v. State Ex Rel. Kennedy 836 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P. v. U.S. Filter/Arrowhead, Inc. 834 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Pcs Nitrogen Fert. v. US filter/arrowhead 834 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Strain v. Williams 835 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Doucet v. National Maintenance Corp. 822 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Duhe v. Weber's IGA Store 800 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Adams v. Arceneaux 809 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
App. 1 Cir. 9/25/98), , overruled on other grounds, Independent Fire Ins.
Simmons v. Berry 779 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1 Cir. 9/25/98) , , this court held that a document that is not "an affidavit or sworn to in any way, or which is not certified or attached to an affidavit, is not of sufficient evidentiary quality on summary judgment to be given weight in determining whether or not there remain genuine issues of material fact."
Butz v. Lynch 762 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Bless Home Health Agency v. LA DHH 770 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
LD BRINKMAN & CO. v. Kennedy 762 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Sharp v. Harrell 762 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
App. 1 Cir. 9/25/98); , this court set forth the standard of review for summary judgment cases and stated that: Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the trial judge's consideration of whether a summary judgment is appropriate.
Calhoun v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. 768 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Manning v. Sketchler 759 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
1st Cir. 9/25/98), ), we do not reach either of these issue herein because they are not germane to our resolution of this case in its present posture.
Smith v. Continental Casualty Co. 752 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Alerion Bank v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n 753 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Holliday v. State ex rel. Office of Financial Assistance 747 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Meyerex rel. Meyer v. Gulotta 747 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Knockum v. Lewis 747 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Simmons v. Berry 748 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1 Cir. 9/25/98) , , this court determined that such evidence is inadmissible in summary judgment litigation because it is not certified, is not an affidavit or sworn to in any way, and is not attached to an affidavit as required by LSA-C.C.P.
Pitts v. Helmrich & Payne Drilling 739 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Lane Memorial Hosp. v. Watson 734 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Johnson v. Louisiana Department of Labor, Office of Workers' Compensation 737 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999