Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Willett v. Premier Bank, 696 So. 2d 196.
-
Premience Energy LLC v. Dufrene Pipe Company, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 6/4/97), determined that the decision to remand is discretionary with the court on appeal, rather than mandatory: [Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure] Article 2163 clearly states that the plaintiff may demand a remand of the case for trial of the prescription exception.
-
State of Louisiana, Division of Administration, Office of Community Development - Disaster Recovery Unit v. Stephanie B. Poree …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 3 Cir. 6/4/97), (finding the appellate court has discretion to remand for trial of peremptory exception pleaded for the first time on appeal when the interests of justice require a full hearing).
-
G.C. Properties of Jackson Parish, LLC v. Carol R. Rainey
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 6/4/97), this court opined that a remand upon plaintiff’s demand is not required: Article 2163 clearly states that the plaintiff may demand a remand of the case for trial of the prescription exception.
- Steve Crooks and Era Lea Crooks v. State of La., Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Joe McPherson v. Ronald Dauzat, D/B/A Dauzat's Used Equipment La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Succession of Louis Kenneth Hebert, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Succession of Hebert 153 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- Patrick E. Phillips, Jr. v. G & H Seed Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Phillips v. G & H Seed Co., Inc. 10 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Ella Rogers v. Louisiana Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 6/4/97), 5 Defendants claim that the immunities granted in La.R.S.
- Rogers v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 974 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- Ledoux v. Grand Casino-Coushatta 954 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Sister Nira Ledoux v. Grand Casino-Coushatta La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Robert Butch Trost, Sr. v. Donald O'Connor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Trost v. O'CONNOR 955 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Ny Associates v. Board of Com'rs 926 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Gentry v. Biddle 916 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Claudia Reynolds Gentry v. Johnny Biddle, Jr., M.D., Lpcf La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Kenneth Trahan and Lisa A. Trahan v. State of La., Department of Health & Hospitals La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Trahan v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 886 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Trahan v. STATE EX REL. DHH 886 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Lavera George v. Reliance Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- George v. Reliance Insurance Co. 856 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
Talley v. Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans
840 So. 2d 628
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 6/4/97); , we stated: Article 2163 clearly states that the plaintiff may demand a remand of the case for trial of the prescription exception.
-
Hernandez v. Chalmette Medical Center
826 So. 2d 641
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 6/4/97), ; Carmouche v. City of Marksville, 94-122, p. 3 (La.App.
-
Trahan v. Asphalt Associates, Inc.
800 So. 2d 18
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
App. 3 Cir. 6/4/97); , citing Sharkey v. Sterling Drug, Inc., (La.App.
- Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 791 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- Varnes v. Mortaji 788 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-
Joseph v. Vanguard Insurance
758 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 6/4/97); , we stated: Article 2163 clearly states that the plaintiff may demand a remand of the case for trial of the prescription exception.
- Brown v. Brown 745 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-
Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government
732 So. 2d 517
La. 1999
art. 927 B (West Supp.1999) ("The court cannot supply the objections of prescription and res judicata, which must be specially pleaded."); (La.App.
-
Natali v. Froeba
735 So. 2d 30
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 6/4/97), , 201 The Plaintiffs do not cite and we do not find any statutory provision for an award of attorney's fees in the situation before us. Therefore, we make no award of attorney's fees.
-
Robin E. Owens & Associates, Inc. v. Booth
729 So. 2d 1096
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 6/4/97) , ; In re Ponchatalawa, Inc., (La.App.
- Griggs v. Riverland Medical Center 722 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998