DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Blackwell v. Kershenstine, 690 So. 2d 247.

14 citing documents.

  • Vincent Alexander v. Albert Da Da" P. Menard " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/27/97), writ denied, 97-545 (La.
  • Alexander v. Menard 215 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/27/97) , , writ denied, 97-545 (La.3/14/97), ).
  • Charles F. Smith, Jr. v. Jonathan D. Goins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/27/97), writ denied, 97-545 (La.
  • Smith v. Goins 994 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/27/97), , writ denied, 97-545 (La.3/14/97), ( (La.App.
  • Joseph K. Fontenot v. Pyramid Alloys, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 2/27/97), writ denied, 97-0545 (La.
  • Fontenot v. Pyramid Alloys, Inc. 872 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 2/27/97) , , writ denied, 97-0546 (La.3/14/97) .
  • Justin Conner v. Gene T. Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 2/27/97), writ denied, 97- 0545 (La.
  • Conner v. Allen 872 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 2/27/97) , , writ denied, 97-0545 (La.3/14/97), .
  • Richard Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 2/27/97), writ denied, 97-0545 (La.
  • Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 856 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 2/27/97) , , writ denied, 97-0545 (La.3/14/97) .
  • Knott v. Angelle 846 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 2/27/97) , , writ denied, 97-0545 (La.3/14/97) .
  • Broussard v. Duhon 748 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 2/27/97) ; , *15 writ denied, 97-0545 (La.3/14/97), , this court stated as follows: “...
  • Bailey v. Bolton 755 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    App.3d Cir. 2/27/97); , writ denied, 97-0545 (La.3/14/97); .
  • Herpin v. Boudreaux 709 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    App. 3 Cir. 2-27-97); , writ denied, 97-0545 (La.3/14/97); , this court set out the general standards of review in elections suits as follows: The standard by which we review lower court decisions demands great deference to the trier of fact's findings when, as here, such findings are based on determinations regarding the cr