DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 702 So. 2d 1014.

13 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. A. D. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 10/29/97), writ denied, 97- 2990 (La.
  • State v. A.D.L. 64 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) , , writ denied, 97-2990 (La.11/6/98), (evidence of molestation of unrelated victim when she was the same age as the instant victim admissible given the similarities of the | instances of abuse to prove lustful disposition, motive, plan, and to refute any contention that the abuse was the result of acciden
  • State of Louisiana v. A.B.M., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/29/97), writ denied, 97-2990 (La.
  • State v. A.B.M. 52 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) , , writ denied, 97-2990 (La.11/6/98), .
  • State v. Fisher 40 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) , ; State v. Free, 26,267, (La.App.
  • State v. Onstead 875 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) , , writ denied, 97-2990 (La.11/6/98), .
  • State v. Kelley 836 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    App. 3d Cir.10/29/97), , writ denied, 97-2990 (La.11/6/98), .
  • Hardge v. Dubosq 797 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) ; ; State v. Winston, 97-1183 (La.App.
  • State v. Darbonne 787 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) ; , writ denied, 97-2990 (La.11/6/98); ; see also State v. Dugas, 94-769 (La.App.
  • State v. Bamburg 772 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) ; ; writ denied, 97-2990 (La.11/6/98); ().
  • State v. Caldwell 742 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    App. 3 Cir. 10/29/97), , writ denied 97-2990 (La.11/6/98), .
  • State v. Mickens 731 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    3d Cir.10/29/97), , writ denied, 97-2990 (La.11/6/98), .
  • State v. Miller 718 So. 2d 960 La. 1998
    3rd Cir. 10/29/97), (evidence of molestation of unrelated victim when she was the same age as the instant victim admissible given the similarities of the instances of abuse to prove "lustful disposition," motive, plan, and to refute any contention that the abuse was the result of accident or mistake); State v. Chapman, 96-152 (La.App.