DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ducote v. City of Alexandria, 706 So. 2d 673.

19 citing documents.

  • Gerald Bordelon v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 2/4/98), writs denied, 98-1061 and 98-1070 (La.
  • Bordelon v. City of Alexandria 101 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 2/4/98) , , writs denied, 98-1061 and 98-1070 (La.5/29/98), .
  • Dana Desselle v. Michael Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 2/4/98), writs denied, 98-1061 & 98-1070 (La.
  • Desselle v. LaFleur 865 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 2/4/98), , writs denied, 98-1061 & 98-1070 (La.5/29/98), .
  • Iberia Parish School Board v. Patsy Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Iberia Parish School Board v. Broussard 854 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Hanks v. COLUMBIA WOMEN'S AND CHILD. HOSP. 865 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    App. 3 Cir. 2/4/98), , writs denied, 98-1061 & 98-1070 (La.5/29/98), .
  • Bordelon v. City of Alexandria 822 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 2/4/98) ; , writs denied, 98-1061 and 98-1070 (La.5/29/98); .
  • Wallace v. Covenant Nursing Home 823 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 2/4/98) , , 674 to support its position that the law of the case doctrine “recognizes the binding force of trial court rulings during later stages of the trial” and that “[t]he reasons for this doctrine are: (1) avoidance of indefinite litigations; (2) consistency of results in the same litigation; (3) essential fairness betwee
  • Flatland Real Estate Co., LLC v. Dugas Const., Inc. 784 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 2/4/98) ; , writs denied, 98-1061, 98-1070 (La.5/29/98); .
  • Clavier v. Roberts 783 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 2/4/98); -75 , writs denied, 98-1061, 98-1070 (La.5/29/98); , we discussed the law of the case doctrine, stating: The law of the case doctrine "recognizes the binding force of trial court rulings during later stages of the trial...."
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 772 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    App. 3 Cir. 2/4/98); , writ denied, 98-1048 (La.5/29/98); ; Jones v. McDonald's Corp., 97-2287 (La.App.
  • Kaleel v. Division Transport 769 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 2/4/98); -675 , writ not considered, 98-1048 (La.5/29/98); .
  • McPherson v. LAKE AREA MEDICAL CENTER 767 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 2/4/98), -675 , writ not considered, 98-1048 (La.5/29/98), .
  • Hesse v. CHAMP SERVICE LINE 758 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 2/4/98) ; , writ not considered, 98-1048 (La.5/29/98); 719 * writs denied, 98-1061, 98-1070 (La.5/29/98); , in which we applied the law-of-the-case doctrine to our previous ruling on a writ application to the effect that there was no error in the trial court's refusal to enlarge the class of plainti
  • Burkett v. UDS Management Corp. 741 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 2/4/98), -675 , writ not considered, 98-1048 (La.5/29/98), .
  • Schultz v. Doyle 727 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 2/4/98); -675 , writ not considered, 98-1048 (La.5/29/98); .
  • Soileau v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 724 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 2/4/98) ; , writ denied, 98-1061 (La.5/29/98); .
  • City of Jennings v. Clay 719 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998