DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reeder v. North, 701 So. 2d 1291.

155 citing documents.

  • MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1173 La. 2011
    In Reeder v. North, 97-239 (La.10/21/97), , this Court held that a pending appeal does not toll the expiration of the statutory peremptive period for a legal malpractice claim.
  • Oxy USA Inc. v. Quintana Production Co. 79 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 2002-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , quoting Reeder v. North, 1997-0239, pp. 12-13 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Barcia v. Louisiana Medical Malpractice Insurance Co. 67 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Ourso, 02-1978 at p. 4, 842 So.2d at 349; Hebert, 486 So.2d at 723 ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Williams v. EARL K. LONG MEDICAL CENTER 40 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    The appellees rely on the Louisiana Supreme Court’s holding in Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Wyman v. DUPEPE CONSTRUCTION 24 So. 3d 848 La. 2009
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97)
  • Naghi v. Brener 17 So. 3d 919 La. 2009
    9:5605(B) clearly provides that the one and three year periods are peremptive, in Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), , this Court held that the three-year period was peremptive and thus, the plaintiff's claim was time-barred because he did not file his action three years from the date of the negligent act, [7] even though he did not discover the basis for his claim until after that time period had expired.
  • Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 186 La. 2009
    istinction between peremption and prescriptive periods); Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Com'n, 98-1737, p. 14, n. 10 (La.3/2/99), n. 10 (Public Service Commission; citing Hebert for the principle that Legislative purpose is one of the most significant factors in distinguishing peremptive and prescriptive statutes); Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12 (La.10/21/97), (legal malpractice provision; citing Hebert as authority that contra non does not apply to peremption), or in the applic
  • Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 10/1/96), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 5 (La.1/26/96), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; M.J.
  • Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 10/1/96), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 5 (La.1/26/96), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; M.J.
  • Pate v. Regional Transit Authority 8 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Needom v. Robein 7 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), , examined the statute and concluded that it had both a prescriptive component and a peremptive component.
  • Jackson v. JEFFERSON PARISH CLERK OF COURT 993 So. 2d 219 La. 2008
    of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; Hebert v. Doctors Mem.
  • McGuire v. Mosley Rogers Title Co., LLC 997 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Burk Prop. Inv. v. Alliance Ins. Agen. Ser. 993 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Id., 05-458, p. 10, 918 So.2d at 1213 ( citing Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ).
  • Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
    Ourso, 02-1978 at p. 4, 842 So.2d at 349; Hebert, 486 So.2d at 723 ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Ferguson v. Sugar 988 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , citing Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12, (La.10/21/97), .
  • State v. Hatton 985 So. 2d 709 La. 2008
    10/21/97), ; Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc., 2006-2923 (La.2/2/07), ; Hillman v. Akins, 93-0631 (La.
  • Jackson v. JEFFERSON PARISH CLERK OF COURT 981 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , and Reeder v. North, 97-0239, pp. 12-13 (La.10/21/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Clinton B. Schneider, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65.
  • State v. Schneider 981 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Broadscape. Com, Inc. v. Matthews 980 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 974 So. 2d 1266 La. 2008
    9:5605; see also Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 6 (La.10/21/97), ; Jennifer Thornton, Comment: Louisiana Revised Statute Section 9:5605: A Louisiana Lawyer's Best Friend, 74 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Brumfield v. McElwee 976 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ,'1295.
  • Schilling v. McIntyre 973 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Wong v. Hoffman 973 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In Reeder v. North, 97-0239, pp. 6-7 (La.10/21/97), -96 , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the peremptive periods set forth in La.
  • Deculus v. Welborn 964 So. 2d 930 La. 2007
    Istre v. Meche, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239, (La.10/21/97), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, (La.1/26/96), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Family Worship Center Church, Inc. v. Solomon 958 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • In Re Noe 958 So. 2d 617 La. 2007
    [4] In Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), , this court held that the continuous representation doctrine no longer operates in legal malpractice bases to suspend prescription because the one- and three-year periods of limitation in legal malpractice cases established by La.Rev.Stat.
  • Naquin v. LAFAYETTE CITY-PARISH GOVERNMENT 950 So. 2d 657 La. 2007
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , and Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. O'Neal Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    10/21/1997), (citing Hebert v. Doctors Mem’l Hosp., ).
  • Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. Jones 948 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12 (La.10/21/1997), (citing Hebert v. Doctors Mem’l Hosp., ).
  • London Towne Condo. Ass'n v. LONDON TOWNE 939 So. 2d 1227 La. 2006
    As we held in Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), , in interpreting the legal malpractice prescriptive and peremptive period under La.
  • Jeanmarie v. Butler 942 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Reeder v. North, 97-239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Ceasar v. Hebert 926 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Irving Ceasar v. Sheriff Sid Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65.
  • Succession of Samuel McKay, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • In Re Succession of McKay 921 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Reeder v. North, 97-239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Atlas Iron and Metal Company v. D. Warren Ashy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    10/21/1997), (citing Hebert v. Doctors Mem’l Hosp., ).
  • Atlas Iron and Metal Co. v. Ashy 918 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12 (La.10/21/1997), ().
  • Ascension School Emp. Credit Union v. Psha 916 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Burns v. Goudeau 888 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    9:5605 cases by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Henry L. Burns v. Christian M. Goudeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Don Leger v. John Haas Weinstein La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    10/21/97), the supreme court overruled prior jurisprudence dealing with the prematurity of legal malpractice actions.
  • Leger v. Weinstein 885 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Second, in Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), the supreme court overruled prior jurisprudence dealing with the prematurity of legal malpractice actions.
  • Biggers v. Allstate Ins. Co. 886 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    NOTES [1] Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Ernest L. Parker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Don Leger v. John Haas Weinstein La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    10/21/97), in support of this argument.
  • Marsh Engineering Inc. v. Parker 883 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    See also Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Turner v. Busby 883 So. 2d 412 La. 2004
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; (La.App.
  • Smith v. Slattery 877 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    In Cardneaux v. Dollar, 31,718 (La.App.2d Cir.03/31/99), , this court summarized the Louisiana Supreme Court's review of this malpractice statute as follows: The recent opinion of our supreme court in Reeder v. North, 97-0239, (La.10/21/97), , provides primary guidance for the interpretation of this statute which was first enacted in l990.