DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 707 So. 2d 17.

14 citing documents.

  • Hoti, Inc. v. Jason Hart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    an inmate’s workers’ compensation claim during his incarceration, without interruption, while prohibiting the inmate from pursing a claim for compensation benefits would unconstitutionally deny that inmate’s access to the courts during his imprisonment, a situation that was frowned upon by the supreme court in Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-397 (La.1/21/98)
  • HOTI, Inc. v. Hart 134 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    that to allow prescription to run on an inmate’s workers’ compensation claim during his incarceration, without interruption, while prohibiting the inmate from pursing a claim for compensation benefits would unconstitutionally deny that inmate’s access to the courts during his imprisonment, a situation that was frowned upon by the supreme court in Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-397 (La.1/21/98), .
  • Jason Hart v. Highlines Construction Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    1/21/98), 2 2 The first circuit in Gobert, 13 So.3d at 610, discussed the supreme court case of Clark, stating: In Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 1997-0397 (La.1/21/98), the court found that incarceration does not suspend the running of prescription for f
  • Hart v. Highlines Construction Co. 127 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    allow prescription to run on an inmate’s workers’ compensation claim during his incarceration, without interruption, while prohibiting the inmate from pursing a claim for compensation benefits would unconstitutionally deny that inmate’s access to the courts during his imprison *1056 ment, a situation that was frowned upon by the supreme court in Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-397 (La.1/21/98), .
  • White v. BHB OIL 34 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    In Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 1997-0397 (La.1/21/98), , the supreme court stated that the statute provided for the temporary forfeiture of the right to receive benefits so that inmates will not be receiving compensation checks while incarcerated.
  • Gobert v. S.W.D.I., L.L.C. 13 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 1997-0397 (La.1/21/98), , the court found that incarceration does not suspend the running of prescription for filing a workers’ compensation claim while the injured worker remains confined.
  • Terry L. Piper v. Shakti, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-397 (La.1/21/98)
  • Piper v. Shakti, Inc. 856 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-0397 (La.1/21/98); .
  • Bellard v. SEALE GUEST HOUSE. 829 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-397 (La.1/21/98); .
  • Duplechain v. Dept. of Transportation & Development 827 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In noting the purpose of the prescriptive periods found in Louisiana Revised Statute 23:1209, the supreme court in Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97- *569 397, pp. 2-3 (La.1/21/98), , stated: The purpose of the prescriptive periods set forth in the statute is to enable an employer to determine when his potential liability for an accident will cease, to prevent, as a matter of public policy, suits based on stale claims where evidence might be destroyed or difficult to produce, and to fix a sta
  • Clark v. Cookies 809 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Brown v. Willamette Industries 775 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-0397 (La.1/21/98), .
  • Millican v. General Motors Corp. 771 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-0397 (La.01/21/98), ; Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc., 208 La.
  • Jowers v. LIBERTY CONST. CO. 740 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    23:1201.4 in Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 97-0397 (La.1/21/98), , and acknowledged that there was support for Defendants' position in language contained in Clark .