Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Simms v. Butler, 702 So. 2d 686.

25 citing documents.

Stephanie Lewis v. State National Insurance Company, Inc., D/B/A Qeo Insurance Group, David Degruy, Richard's Disposal, Inc., and … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Donna Johnson v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Co., 98- 2040 (La.6/4/99), Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97)
Calvin Landry & Mary Landry v. Progressive La. 2022
Calvin Landry & Mary Landry v. Progressive Security Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
12/2/97), (emphasis added), noted the applicability of La.R.S.
Brown ex rel. Children v. Homer Sargent, Evans Envtl. & Geological Sci. & Mgmt., LLC 241 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Litton v. White 169 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co., 98-2040 (La.6/4/99), ; Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97), .
Bernard v. Ellis 111 So. 3d 995 La. 2012
(citing Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97), ).
Partain v. Peaker 91 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
See Simms v. Butler, 1997-0416 (La.12/2/97), ; Weston v. Hollis, 26,380 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), Gonzales v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, 99-0792 (La.App.
Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co. 58 So. 3d 441 La. 2011
32:900(B)(2) is “commonly known as the statutory omnibus clause.” Simms v. Butler, 1997-0416, p. 3 (La.12/2/97), .
Sauer v. National Car Rental System, Inc. 980 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Delores Armstrong v. Thrifty Car Rental La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Armstrong v. Thrifty Car Rental 933 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In support of its motion for summary judgment, Metropolitan cited Simms v. Butler, 97-416 (La.12/2/97), .
Bryant v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 881 So. 2d 1214 La. 2004
Adams v. Thomas, 98-2003, pp. 3-4 (La.4/13/99), ; Simms v. Butler, 97-0416, p. 2 (La.12/2/97), .
Bryant v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'N 881 So. 2d 1214 La. 2004
Adams v. Thomas, 98-2003, pp. 3-4 (La.4/13/99), ; Simms v. Butler, 97-0416, p. 2 (La.12/2/97), .
Sauer v. National Car Rental System, Inc. 873 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
In Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97), , the defendant Butler was driving a rental vehicle with permission of Newton Moore, the person designated on the rental agreement as the only authorized driver.
Lemoine v. Illinois National Insurance Co. 868 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Illinois contends that this provision does not apply and relies on Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97), as supporting authority.
Clements v. FOLSE EX REL. CLEMENTS 830 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Simms v. Butler, 97-0416, p. 3 (La.12/2/97), .
Williams v. US Agencies Cas. Ins. Co., Inc. 779 So. 2d 729 La. 2001
Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97)
King v. Jewell 759 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
or forbidden by the law.” The term “possession” is defined therein as “the detention and control, or the manual or ideal custody, of anything which may be the subject of property, for one’s use and enjoyment, either as owner or as the proprietor of a qualified right in it, and either held personally or by another who exercises it in one’s place and name.” In Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, in footnote five, recognized that some insurance companies have broad
Marcus v. Hanover Ins. Co., Inc. 740 So. 2d 603 La. 1999
[2] Simms v. Butler, 97-0416, p. 2 (La.12/2/97)
Gonzales v. Progressive Specialty Insurance 732 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In seeking summary judgment
Adams v. Thomas 729 So. 2d 1041 La. 1999
Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97)
State Farm Automobile Ass'n v. Morgan 709 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
32:851-1043, provides a mandatory, comprehensive scheme for the protection of the public from damage caused by motor vehicles.” Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97), (emphasis added).
Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 707 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
All automobile insurance policies issued in this state are considered as containing all provisions required by statute, Simms v. Butler, 97-0416 (La.12/2/97), .
Dees v. National Security Fire & Casualty Insurance 707 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
National Security’s policy provides coverage for a borrowed car if it is used (1) with the “direct and express permission” of the owner and (2) “within the limits of that permission.” As the supreme court explained in Simms v. Butler, 97-0416, p. 3 (La.12/2/97), , the requirements of La.R.S.