DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Evans v. Lungrin, 708 So. 2d 731.

639 citing documents.

  • Sneed v. RTA/TMSEL 869 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, pp. 6-7 (La.2/6/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong.”
  • Ramona Ann Marcentel Winzor v. Robert Wade Winzor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Winzor v. Winzor 856 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577, p. 13 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Mimms v. Brown 856 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Evans v. Lungrin, 1997-0541, p. 12-13 (La.2/6/98), (emphasis in the original), our Supreme Court set forth the burden of proof for the modification of a custody judgment as follows: [T]he paramount consideration in any determination of child custody is the best interest of the child.
  • Leger v. Leger 854 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    [2] Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • David v. Our Lady of Lake Hosp., Inc. 857 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 pp. 6-7 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Stephenson v. Stephenson 847 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 131; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • White v. Kimrey 847 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.02/06/98), ; Shaffer v. Shaffer, 00-1251 (La.App.
  • Montalvo v. Montalvo 854 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Opinion “[W]here the original custody decree is a stipulated judgment, the party seeking modification must prove (1) that there has been a material change of circumstances since the original custody decree was entered, and (2) that the proposed modification is in the best interest of the child.” Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577, p. 13 (La.2/6/98)
  • Slaydon v. Cold Springs Hunting Club, Inc. 842 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, pp. 6-7 (La.2/6/98), (citations omitted).
  • Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 844 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), ; Turner v. Ostrowe, 01-1935 (La.App.
  • Ratliff v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 844 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, p. 6 (La.2/16/98), ; Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
  • Trettin v. Trettin 839 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Such judgment is provisional only in the sense that custody may be altered later, after material changes in circumstances occur, as illustrated in cases such as Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), (La.
  • Flanagan v. Flanagan 839 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), ; Hoskins v. Hoskins, 36,031 (La.App.2d Cir.4/5/02), ; Masters v. Masters, 33,438 (La.App.2d Cir.4/5/00), ; writ denied, 01-3096 (La.12/7/01), .
  • Schultz v. Hill 840 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, p. 6 (La.2/6/98), ; Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
  • Duzon v. Stallworth 866 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, pp. 6-7 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 839 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Aucoin v. Aucoin 834 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 12/11/96) ; , rev'd on other grounds, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Palace Prop. v. Sizeler Hammond Square Par. 839 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), ; Turner v. Ostrowe, 01-1935 (La.App.
  • Dupre v. Dupre 834 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, pp. 7-8 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Sandoval v. Sandoval 832 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98), ; Alexander v. Alexander, 02-683 (La.App.
  • Martin v. Martin 833 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    In Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), , the court considered whether a stipulated joint custody arrangement should be modified to sole custody when one parent moved to Washington.
  • Alexander v. Alexander 831 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a trial court's *1064 award of four-month, alternating, split physical custody was not in the best interest of the two-year-old child.
  • Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    “A legal error occurs when a trial'court applies incorrect legal principles of law and such errors are prejudicial.” Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, pp. 6-7 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Wingfield v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, pp. 6-7 (La.2/6/98), .
  • McMahon v. McMahon 829 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Turner v. Ostrowe 828 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Mathews v. Hixson Bros., Inc. 831 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Stephens v. Stephens 822 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    However, in Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, pp. 6-7 (La.2/6/98), , the supreme court re-stated the well-established legal principal that any legal error made by the trial court may be grounds for a reversal of the lower judgment: It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in the absence of "manifest error" or unless
  • Shambley v. Holmes 821 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See also, Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Austin Homes, Inc. v. Thibodeaux 821 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    [8] Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541 (La.2/6/98); ; Harvey v. T.H.E.
  • Hoskins v. Hoskins 814 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    art. 131; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • RHODES STEEL BLDGS. v. Walker Const. Co. 813 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.02/06/98), .
  • Greene v. Taylor 809 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Griffin v. Lago Espanol, LLC 808 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Cf. Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, p. 7 (La.2/6/98)
  • Street v. May 803 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Doh v. Tlh 799 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577, pp. 12-13 (La.2/6/98); (case citations omitted).
  • Duncan v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 799 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.02/06/98), .
  • Amin v. Bakhaty 798 So. 2d 75 La. 2001
    Code art. 131; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Guillory v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 796 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Masters v. Masters 795 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Brown v. Brown 801 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), ; Warlick v. Warlick, 27,389 (La.App.
  • Gaylord Container Corporation v. CNA Ins. Companies 807 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), .
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Little 794 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), ; Masters v. Masters, 33,438 (La.App.2d Cir.4/5/00)
  • Amin v. Bakhaty 812 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), .
  • State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections v. Ford 787 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98)
  • Chance v. Chance 784 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    The trial court issued reasons for judgment on December 9, 1998, awarding custody as follows: The above [ Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98); ] noted it is the decision of the Court that it is in the best interest of the children that joint custody is to be awarded and that the father is to be the custodial or domiciliary parent.
  • Smith v. Smith 785 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Bergeron v. Bergeron, 492 hSo.2d 1193 (La.1986) and Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 13 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Mills v. Wilkerson 785 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Plaisance v. Dept. of Social Services 777 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 11/12/97) , ; see also, Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, (La.2/6/98), .