DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Evans v. Lungrin, 708 So. 2d 731.

639 citing documents.

  • Smith v. Gaylord Container Corp. 777 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), ; Oubre v. Jacobs Engineering Group, 98-1129 (La.App.
  • Lewis v. Lewis 771 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.02/06/98), ; Masters v. Masters, 33,438 (La.App.2d Cir.04/05/00), .
  • Jones v. Rodrigue 771 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, p. 8 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Darbonne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Curtis v. Curtis 773 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    art. 131; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.02/06/98), ; Oglesby v. Oglesby, 25,974 (La.
  • Rogers v. Stockmon 780 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    art. 131; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Griffin v. Daigle 769 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Shaffer v. Shaffer 808 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, pp. 12-13 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Washkow v. Washkow 765 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), We acknowledge that the trial court's decision in child custody matters is entitled to great weight and it will not be overturned absent a showing of manifest error or abuse of discretion.
  • Pettifield v. Venture, Inc. 770 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, p. 7 (La.1998); .
  • Harvey ex rel. Bates v. T.H.E. Insurance 764 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    I. Standard of Review Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, p. 6-7 (La.2/6/98); , provides *357 the standard of review of both factual and legal error: It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong.” However, where one or more trial court legal errors interdict the fact
  • In Re Succession of Moss 769 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, pp. 6-7, (La.2/6/98); (citations omitted).
  • Barriere Construction Co., Inc. v. Systems Contractors Corporation 764 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), ; Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Benware v. Means 760 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    As the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), , 735: A legal error occurs when a trial court applies incorrect principles of law and such errors are prejudicial.
  • Bloomer v. LOUISIANA WORKERS'COMPENSATION 767 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Masters v. Masters 756 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    art. 131; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), ; Oglesby v. Oglesby, 25,974 (La.App.2d Cir.8/17/94), .
  • Deason v. Deason 759 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Fusilier v. Dauterive 759 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Appellate review of legal error is discussed in Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98); , (citations omitted): A legal error occurs when a trial court applies incorrect principles of law and such errors are prejudicial.
  • Knepper v. Robin 745 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Polezcek v. Polezcek 752 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    [3] Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, pp. 12-13 (La.2/6/98)
  • Evans v. Coody 758 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Evans v. *258 Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Aeb v. Jbe 752 So. 2d 756 La. 1999
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Boneski v. City of Abbeville 745 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Appellate review of legal error is discussed in Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98); , (citations omitted): A legal error occurs when a trial court applies incorrect principles of law and such errors are prejudicial.
  • Sevario v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 752 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    As the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), , 735: *231 A legal error occurs when a trial court applies incorrect principles of law and such errors are prejudicial.
  • McKenzie v. Evans Quality Temporaries 746 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Evans v. Lungrin, 94-0541 (La.2/6/98) .
  • Falgout v. Dealers Truck Equipment Co. 748 So. 2d 399 La. 1999
  • Crowson v. Crowson 742 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    art. 131; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), ; Oglesby v. Oglesby, 25,974 (La.
  • Folse v. Folse 738 So. 2d 1040 La. 1999
    See Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Miller v. Miller 743 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    art. 131; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Willis v. Duck 733 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, pp. 12-13, (La.2/6/98); .
  • Long v. Dossett 732 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    In Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98); , the supreme court performed a de novo review when it found that the trial court misapplied La.
  • Constance v. Traill 736 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-6541 and 97-0577 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Becnel v. Becnel 732 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Mire v. Mire 734 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), citing Hensgens v. Hensgens, 94-1200 (La.App.
  • Panyanouvong v. T & H Convenience Store, Inc. 734 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 7 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Courville v. City of Lake Charles 720 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98); .
  • Shaw v. Shaw 714 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Voelkel v. Voelkel 712 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    DISCUSSION In Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, pp. 12-13 '(La.2/6/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court recently addressed the burden of proof in modifying custody decisions: 3 [T]he paramount consideration in any determination of child custody is the best interest of the child.
  • Jessen v. Jessen 715 So. 2d 1195 La. 1998
    Case remanded to the trial court to reconsider in light of Evans v. Lungrin, No. 97-C-0541