DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 704 So. 2d 1161.

172 citing documents.

  • Coleman v. Ranger 886 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp. 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), , 1164 and cases cited therein.
  • Montgomery v. Orleans Parish School Board 876 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Dowell v. Ochsner Clinic of Baton Rouge 874 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.
  • Wilkerson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 864 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Myrtle K. Latigue v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    LAW AND DISCUSSION Standard of Review “Factual findings in worker's compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.” Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/02/97)
  • Latigue v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp. 861 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/02/97), .
  • Simmons v. Associated Hospital Services, Inc. 862 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Schindler v. ORLEANS REGIONAL SEC. 862 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Gastinell v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 862 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Begue v. Crossover, Inc. 868 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688, p. 12 (La.12/02/97), .
  • Fite v. Louisiana Title Co. 859 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Hymes, supra ; Shields v. GNB Technologies, Inc., 33,911 (La.App.2d Cir.10/04/00), ; Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), .
  • King v. Willstaff Worldwide, Inc. 855 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Mitchell v. United Parcel Service 855 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Johnson v. T & LNAS/Domino Sugar 854 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Daniels v. Keller Supply, Inc. 854 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Alphonso v. Bridge Terminal Transport 852 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Brister v. Pizza Inn 859 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    | o,LAW AND DISCUSSION The standard for reviewing workers’ compensation cases was summarized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, pp. 4-5 (La.12/02/97), , as follows: Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Cannedy v. Yarborough 858 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688, pp. 7-8 (La.12/02/97), .
  • Weeks v. Angelo Iafrate Construction Co. 850 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks, supra.
  • Johnson v. Cox Communications 848 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97); .
  • Abadie v. MARSIGLIA CONST. CO. 845 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Troutman v. Hart 844 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Clairain v. Wal-Mart Supercenter 0541 844 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    I .STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard for reviewing workers’ compensation cases was summarized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, pp. 4-5 (La.12/02/97), , as follows: Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Hallaron v. JACOB'S ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 839 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), , citing Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305, p. 4 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, pp. 4-5 (La.1/14/94), -38 .
  • Alexis v. Alton Ochsner Foundation Hospital 869 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97); ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Williams v. Grady Crawford Construction Co. 845 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    |,.STANDARP OF REVIEW The standard for reviewing workers’ compensation cases was summarized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, pp. 4-5 (La.12/02/97), , as follows: Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Tynes v. Gaylord Container Corp. 844 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    23:1221(3)(a) and Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), , Gaylord asserts that under the clear wording of the statute and the unambiguous interpretation by the Louisiana Supreme Court, it did not have the obligation to engage in any vocational rehabilitation or related activities until Mr. Tynes met his initial burden of proving that he was unable to earn 90 percent or mor
  • Moore v. Miciotto 836 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Hymes, supra; Shields v. GNB Technologies, Inc., 33,911 (La.App.2d Cir.10/04/00), ; Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), .
  • Lee v. Schumpert 836 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), ; Hymes v. Monroe Mack Sales, supra .
  • Moore v. City of New Orleans 839 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • LeBlanc v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 834 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Hoy v. Gilbert, 98-1565 (La.3/2/99), ; Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Comeaux v. Star Enterprise/Motiva Enterprise 836 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 6 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Friedley v. Alexander Electrical, Inc. 836 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688, pp. 7-8 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Bolton v. Mike Fleming Const. 833 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), ; Figueroa v. Hardtner Medical Center, 35,678 (La.App.2d Cir.1/25/02), .
  • Dioguardi v. Holiday Inn 833 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), , 1164 the Supreme Court explained: LSA-RS 23:1031.1(A) entitles every employee who is disabled because of the contraction of an occupational disease to receive compensation benefits, provided that the employee’s illness arises out of and in the course and scope of his employment.
  • Fite v. Louisiana Title Co. 828 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Hymes, supra ; Shields v. GNB Technologies, Inc., 33,911 (La.App.2d Cir.10/04/00), ; Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), .
  • Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government 813 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), .
  • Smith v. Season's Manufacturing 815 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Seal v. Gaylord, Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97); .
  • Figueroa v. Hardtner Medical Center 805 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Hoy v. Gilbert, 98-1565 (La.3/2/99), ; Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Department of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Myles v. Printpack, Inc. 806 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97 0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Shields v. GNB Technologies, Inc., 33,911 (La.App.
  • Hood v. Metro Industrial Corp. 806 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard for reviewing workers' compensation cases was summarized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, pp. 4-5 (La.12/02/97), , as follows: Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • King v. Stranco, Inc. 818 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 6 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Carmean v. Enterprise Products Partners, L.L.P. 804 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    *99 STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard for reviewing workers’ compensation cases was summarized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, pp. 4-5 (La.12/02/97), , as follows: Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Greenhill Nursing Home v. Ferguson 796 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.’ ” Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98); -81 (alteration in original) (citations omitted) (quoting Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 5 (La.12/2/97); (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
  • Whiddon v. Livingston Parish Council 809 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, 97-0688, pp. 4-5 (La.12/02/97), , reiterated that the standard of appellate review in workers' compensation cases is that factual findings are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard.
  • Harris v. National Gypsum Co. 797 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Livaccari v. Alden Engineering Service 785 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Shell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 782 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Seal v. *1159 Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97), .
  • Hillman v. Comm-Care, Inc. 782 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/2/97); , the court held that the statute was inapplicable if the claim was reasonably controverted.
  • Marks v. 84 Lumber Co. 771 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.'" Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98); -81 (alteration in original) (citations omitted) ( quoting Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 5 (La.12/2/97); ( quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.