Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Morgan v. ABC MANUFACTURER, 710 So. 2d 1077.
-
Efren Galindo v. Jose Castillo, J&T Poultry Services, LLC, and House of Raeford Farms of Louisiana, L.L.C.
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
5/1/98), and that courts apply a nine-part test for finding a borrowed employee, citing Dyer v. Serv.
-
Damon J. Nelson v. Texaco, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
5/1/98), See generally Darty v. Transocean Offshore U.S.A., Inc., 2003-1669 (La.App.
-
Carter v. Pointe Coupee Parish Sch. Board
268 So. 3d 1064
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/1/98), , 1083 (holding that where a general employer is in the business of hiring its employees out under the supervision of others, the general employer remains liable for the "borrowed" employees' torts under La.
-
Knoten v. Westbrook
193 So. 3d 380
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The Court “specifically repudiated the ‘one master’ rule in favor of solidary liability among the general and the special employers.” Morgan v. ABC Mfr., 97-0956, p. 13 (La.5/1/98), .
-
Harvey v. Brown
105 So. 3d 92
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 1997-0956 (La.05/01/98), .
-
Jackie R. Gonzales v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/1/98), as authority for liability under the enterprise theory.
-
Gonzales v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.
76 So. 3d 144
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The - Gonzaleses cite Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-956 (La.5/1/98), as authority for liability under the enterprise theory.
-
Grimes v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO.
29 So. 3d 505
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956, p. 6 (La.5/1/98), .
-
LeCroy v. Interim Health Care Staffing
980 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
In Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.05/01/98), -3 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Our jurisprudence has held that special and general employers may be solidarily liable in tort to third parties injured by the negligence of their employees.
-
Cobb v. Delta Exports, Inc.
918 So. 2d 1080
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-956 (La.5/1/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that jurisprudential interpretation of La.Civ.Code art. 2320 [2] has consistently provided for an employer's vicarious liability for the torts of its employees.
-
Johnny Leroy Cobb v. Delta Exports, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
5/1/98), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that jurisprudential interpretation of La.Civ.Code art. 23202 has consistently provided for an employer’s vicarious liability for the torts of its employees.
-
McGinnis v. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF LOUISIANA
914 So. 2d 612
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98), .
-
MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL v. Meadowcrest Hosp.
858 So. 2d 99
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Dual Employers In Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether an employer in the business of hiring out temporary employees to other businesses is liable for the tortious conduct of its employees that occurs while they are working at their temporary jobs.
-
Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Tinoco v. Meadowcrest Hospital
858 So. 2d 99
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Dual Employers In Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether an employer in the business of hiring |1fiout temporary employees to other businesses is liable for the tortious conduct of its employees that occurs while they are working at their temporary jobs.
-
Doucet v. National Maintenance Corp.
822 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, observed that the general employer of the injured employee retains statutory immunity as a result of a specific legislative provision of the Workers' Compensation statutes.
-
Grayson v. RB Ammon and Associates, Inc.
778 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956, p. 13 (La.5/1/98), .
-
Jones v. Compression Coat Corp.
776 So. 2d 505
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
However, Jones further contends that, even if Hanks were a borrowed employee of Compression Coat, the trial court still erred in dismissing his complaint against PLC because, under Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98); , the “dual employer” doctrine, which allows both the general employer and special employer to be solidarily liable for the torts of the borrowed employee, prevents PLC from asserting immunity for the negligence of Hanks.
-
Pradia v. Southern Personnel of La., Inc.
776 So. 2d 474
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Compression Coat The plaintiffs also contend that Noah was not the borrowed employee of Compression Coat at the time of the accident but that, in any event, Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98); , makes that inquiry irrelevant.
-
Ortega v. Semco, L.L.C.
762 So. 2d 276
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Appellant Ortega argues that the trial court erred in not considering Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98), .
-
Distinguished
Singletary v. Fridley
762 So. 2d 692
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956, pp. 8-12 (La.5/1/98), -1083 .
-
Gumpert v. Pittman Const. Co., Inc.
736 So. 2d 1026
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
The Supreme Court in Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, DEF Insurance Co., GHI Part Supplier, et al., 97-0956 (La.5/01/98), , restated the law of Borrowed Servant.
-
Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer
734 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Morgan sought writs to the Supreme Court, who granted his application and reversed the trial court and this court, finding that “the trial court committed legal error in instructing the jury that a finding that Hines was Goldin’s borrowed employee would relieve Worktec of liability for his torts.” Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98), .
-
Dyer v. Service Marine Industries, Inc.
723 So. 2d 1135
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In Morgan v. ABC Manufacturer, 97-0956 (La.5/1/98); , the supreme court recently reiterated its repudiation of the limitation of "one master" in favor of "dual employers," who are solidarily liable for the torts of the borrowed servant.
-
Doe v. Parauka
714 So. 2d 701
La. 1998
See, e.g., Morgan v. ABC Mfr., et al., 97-0956 (La.5/1/98), .