DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bailey v. Bailey, 708 So. 2d 354.

14 citing documents.

  • LA. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. McWilliams 996 So. 2d 1036 La. 2008
    James & Co., Sims, supra; -63 (La.1992); Johnson v. Wetherspoon, supra ; Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Paige B. Sullivan v. Charles P. Sullivan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Sullivan v. Sullivan 892 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Moreover, in my view, and Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178 (La.2/6/98), is tenuous.
  • McKinstry v. McKinstry 824 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    See also, Bailey v. Bailey, *1263 97-1178 (La.2/6/98), ; Zalfen v. Albright, 00-1225 (La.App.
  • Lodrigue v. Lodrigue 817 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In considering the nature of DROP as it affects an individual's retirement plan, the trial court relied on the description of the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System (LASERS) DROP program as set forth by the supreme court in Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178, pp. 4-5 (La.2/6/98), , 356: The DROP program is described by LASERS in its publication to members as follows: DROP is an optional method of retiring from the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System (LASERS)....
  • Knighten v. Knighten 809 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    11:447-451; Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178, p.4 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Bullock v. Owens 796 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    11:447-451; Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Zalfen v. Albright 791 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In reviewing the trial court's judgment, we first look to the case of Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178, p. 4, (La.2/6/98), , in which our Supreme Court stated that the DROP program is described by the Louisiana State Employees Retirement System ("LASERS") in its publication to members as follows: DROP is an optional method of retiring from the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System (LASERS)....
  • Sullivan v. Sullivan 801 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    See also Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178 (La.2/6/98); .
  • McCarroll v. McCarroll 767 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178, pp. 6-7 (La.2/6/98), , alluding to its prior decisions in T.L.
  • Karno v. Trustees of the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System 757 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    We find support for this conclusion in the Louisiana Supreme Court’s detailed *701 discussion of DROP in Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178 (La.2/6/98), .
  • Heck v. Heck 728 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Bailey v. Bailey, 97-1178, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), ; (La.
  • Page v. Grambling State University 722 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    See Bailey v. Bailey, *331 97-1178 (La.02/06/98), , discussing Louisiana State Employees Retirement System (LASERS).
  • Schlosser v. Behan 722 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    in which a community existed during part of the time the employee was in DROP.