DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev., 712 So. 2d 62.

84 citing documents.

  • Snearl v. Mercer 780 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Aucoin v. State Through DOTD, 97-1938, p. 4 (La.4/24/98), ; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 3 (La.
  • Odom v. City of Lake Charles 790 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Aucoin v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967, p. 6-8 (La.4/24/98), -67 .
  • Melerine v. State 773 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    See Aucoin v. State through Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1967, p. 9 (La.4/24/97), .
  • Frazer v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 774 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Aucoin v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967, p. 9 (La.4/24/98), .
  • Dennis v. the Finish Line, Inc. 781 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    and Dev., 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), .
  • Hall v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp. 777 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    and Development, 97-C-1938, 97-C-1967 (La.4/24/98), , the Court held that the 1996 amendment was also a substantive change in the law requiring prospective application.
  • Fontenot v. Fontenot 774 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp., 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a statutory amendment revoking the prospect of solidary liability and replacing it with joint and several liability altered an existing rule and, thus, was substantive and only applicable prospectively.
  • Brow v. Allstate Indemnity Co. 771 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    & Dev., 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), ; Dill v. State, Dep’t of Transp.
  • Grayson v. RB Ammon and Associates, Inc. 778 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Subsequently, in Aucoin v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967, pp. 8-10 (La.4/24/98), -68 , the Court addressed the retroactivity of the 1996 amendments to LSA-C.C.
  • Hall v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp. 769 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    and Development, 97-C-1938, 97-C-1967 (La.4/24/98), , the Court held that the 1996 amendment was also a substantive change in the law requiring prospective application.
  • Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 765 So. 2d 994 La. 2000
    and Dev., 97-1938, p. 9-10 (La.4/24/98), .
  • Adams v. Canal Indemnity Co. 760 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    & Dev., 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98); .
  • Smith v. Cutts 759 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    See Aucoin v. Dep't of Transportation & Dev., 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98); .
  • Johnson v. Rogers & Phillips, Inc. 753 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Aucoin v. State Through the Dept. of Transportation and Development, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98) .
  • Johns v. Agrawal 748 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Aucoin v. State through Dept. of Transportation & Development, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), .
  • Lacrouts v. Future Abrasives, Inc. 750 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    and Development, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), .
  • Sevario v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 752 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Aucoin v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967, p. 6-8 (La.4/24/98), -67 .
  • Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 746 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Aucoin v. State, Through DOTD, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98); .
  • Dolmo v. Williams 753 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    and Development, Sup.1998, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), .
  • Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    & Dev., 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98); .
  • Cormier v. Comeaux 748 So. 2d 1123 La. 1999
    and Development, 97-1938 (La.4/24/98), 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), ; Myers v. State Farm Mut.
  • Hooker v. Super Products Corp. 751 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    See e.g. Aucoin v. DOTD, 97-1938, 93-1967 (La.4/24/98), .
  • Jacobs v. City of Bunkie 737 So. 2d 14 La. 1999
    and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967, p. 9 (La.4/24/98), .
  • State v. Lamb 732 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Aucoin v. State through DOTD, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), ; Jackson v. Beasley, 30,359 (La.
  • Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    04/24/98), , the supreme court found that the 1996 revision of La.
  • Jones v. Hawkins 731 So. 2d 216 La. 1999
    After the appellate court's decision in this case was rendered, we held in Aucoin v. State Through Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), , that when a parent brings suit as a tutrix to recover medical expenses that belong to a child, the parent's recovery is not personal and cannot be reduced by the parent's percentage of fault.
  • Shephard ex rel. Shephard v. Scheeler 731 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    and Develop *304 ment, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), , which-held that although Act 3’s amendment of 2323 was merely procedural legislation to be applied retroactively (See, Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), ), the amendment to La.C.C.
  • Bauer v. Viacom, Inc. 729 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Aucoin v. State through Department of Transportation, 97-C1938, 97-C1967 (La.4/24/98); , rehearing Igdenied (6/5/98).
  • Pesson v. Reynolds 727 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    We note the recent case of Aucoin v. State, through Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), .
  • Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    As stated in Aucoin v. State through Dept. of Transportation and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), : Before 1996, article 2324(B) held defendants liable "solidary only to the extent necessary for the person suffering injury, death, or loss to recover fifty percent of his recoverable damages."
  • Dufrene v. Willingham 721 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 724 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Aucoin v. State Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1938, 97-1967, p.10 (La.4/24/98), , available on Westlaw at , 1998 WL 205320 .
  • Wijngaarde v. Parents of Guy 720 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    The Supreme Court's recent decision in Aucoin v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), 1998 WL 205320 , , causes the judgment we render in this case to be awkward.
  • Cormier v. Comeaux 714 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    & Dev., 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98); .