Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Strickland v. Layrisson, 704 So. 2d 228.
- State Of Louisiana In The Interest of H.C La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2026
- Walter W. Travis v. Robert W. Travis La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
- Mitchell Paul Cook v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
- Ryan Meilleur and Elray Clark v. LBC Baton Rouge, LLC and Cory Bonadona La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- Home Bank, N. A. v. Golden La Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
-
State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
11/25/97), this alone was insufficient to establish a Sixth Amendment 21-KA-257 44 violation and that the defendant must also point to a “showing in the record of [a] discrimination against a class of people” in order to establish that a cross-section violation occurred in his case.
- In Re: Medical Review Panel George F. Abrams La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Jacob M. Bell, Sr. v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Darrol Bruce Brown v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Vernon Cox v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr.
263 So. 3d 337
La. 2018
11/25/97), this alone is insufficient to establish a Sixth Amendment violation.
- Raymond Sonnier, Et Ux. v. Johnathan Blake Roberson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-
Everett v. Baton Rouge Student Housing, L.L.C.
64 So. 3d 883
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1st Cir.6/20/97), , writ denied, 97-1940 (La.11/14/97), .
-
State v. Baker
796 So. 2d 145
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
See also, State v. Thomas, 97-1542 (La.11/21/97), .
-
State v. Johnson
783 So. 2d 520
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
art. 419A and State v. Ashworth, 97-2917 (La.11/25/97), .
-
Snearl v. Mercer
780 So. 2d 563
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1st Cir.6/20/97), , writ denied, 97-1940 (La.11/14/97), .
-
Giles v. Cain
762 So. 2d 734
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1st Cir.6/20/97), , writ denied, 97-1940 (La.11/14/97), .
-
State v. Daniels
740 So. 2d 691
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
In State v. Ashworth, 97-2917 (La.11/25/97), , the defendant argued that the general, grand jury, and petit jury venires in Louisiana should be quashed based solely on violation of the statutory requirements in La.C.Cr.P.
-
Baton Rouge Ass'n of School Employees, Local 100 Service Employees International Union v. East Baton Rouge Parish School …
729 So. 2d 1154
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1st Cir.6/20/97), , writ denied, 97-1940 (La.1/14/97), .
-
BATON ROUGE ASS'N v. School Bd.
729 So. 2d 1154
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1st Cir.6/20/97), , writ denied, 97-1940 (La.1/14/97), .
-
State v. Jordan
728 So. 2d 954
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Ashworth, 97-2917 (La.11/25/97), .
-
State v. Arcuri
729 So. 2d 713
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In all cases, the burden of proof “rests on defendant to establish purposeful discrimination in the selection of grand and petit jury venires.” State v. Ashworth, 97-2917, p. 1 (La.11/25/97), ().