Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Blanchard v. Blanchard, 731 So. 2d 175.
-
Noel W. Yates v. Lisa J. Yates
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
1/20/99), the appellate court undertook an in-depth analysis of the various means of partitioning retirement/pension plans including T.L.
-
Chester Washington, Jr. Versus Theresa Washington
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
1/20/99), n.2, citing Elizabeth Alford Beskin, Retirement Equity Inaction: Division of Pension Benefits Upon Divorce in Louisiana, 48 La.
- Carrol Falgout Armand v. Donald Armand La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-
Armand v. Armand
113 So. 3d 1168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Blanchard v. Blanchard, 97-2305 (La.1/20/99), .
- Legaux-Barrow v. Barrow 8 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Welker v. Welker
954 So. 2d 225
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
The court gave a later summary of its Sims and Hare rulings in Blanchard v. Blanchard, 97-2305 (La.1/20/99), -180 , as follows: This Court has recognized two methods of apportioning pension rights.
- Paige B. Sullivan v. Charles P. Sullivan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Sullivan v. Sullivan
892 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
[4] Blanchard v. Blanchard, 97-2305, p. 7 (La.1/20/99), .
-
Donaldson v. Donaldson
831 So. 2d 416
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Blanchard v. Blanchard, 97-2305 (La.1/20/99), , 176 n. 2, citing Elizabeth Alford Beskin, "Retirement Equity Inaction: Division of Pension Benefits Upon Divorce In Louisiana," 48 La.
-
Lupberger v. Lupberger
805 So. 2d 264
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Blanchard v. Blanchard, 97-2305 (La.1/20/99), ; Hare, supra .
-
Couvillion v. Couvillion
769 So. 2d 747
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
See Blanchard v. Blanchard, 97-2305, at 6-7 (La.1/20/99), .
-
DeLaune v. Modica
762 So. 2d 52
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Blanchard v. Blanchard, 97-2305 (La.1/20/99), .
-
Songy v. Songy
738 So. 2d 122
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
uding a community property law) which creates or recognizes the existence of an alternate payee’s right to, or assigns an alternate payee the right to, receive all or a portion of the benefits payable with respect to a participant under a plan and relates to the provision of alimony payments, or marital property rights to a spouse or former spouse.’ ” Blanchard v. Blanchard, 97-2305 (La.1/20/99), , 1999 WL 20779 *9 .