Guidroz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Guidroz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 705 So. 2d 738 (La. 1998).
Cited by
- Logan v. Brink's Inc. 16 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Starr v. Brou 8 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Crochet v. Cisco Systems, Inc. 847 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Woodruff v. State Farm Ins. Co. 767 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- Celestine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 735 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Paul v. Allstate Insurance Co. 720 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Venible v. First Financial Ins. Co. 718 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Opinion text
705 So.2d 738 (1998) Ramona GUIDROZ, et al. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 97-C-2653. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 30, 1998. *739 PER CURIAM. [*] The application is granted. The court of appeal, after reversing the trial court's directed verdict dismissing the insured's cross-claim against the insurer for the amount of the excess judgment based on the insurer's failure to settle within the policy limits, erred by rendering judgment in favor of the cross-claimant. Because the judgment of the trial court was a directed verdict, the insurer did not have the opportunity of presenting its entire case, and the court of appeal should have remanded for that purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal on the insured's cross-claim is set aside, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ. NOTES [*] TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.