Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Riley v. Reliance Ins. Co., 703 So. 2d 158.

24 citing documents.

Hieu Phuong Hoang v. Thornton Services, Inc. 192 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Harper v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 176 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Succession of Ursin v. Board of Levee Commissioners 104 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
4 Cir. 11/19/97), , we turn to an examination of the district court's judgment and the allocation of fault therein.
Lino v. Allstate Insurance Co. 937 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 11/19/97) , , 163: Thus, Clement tells us that the allocation of fault is not an exact science, or the search for one precise ratio.
Harris v. Poche 930 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Forest v. Hiller 879 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Thonn v. Cook 863 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 11/19/97) , : Thus, Clement tells us that the allocation of fault is not an exact science, or the search for one precise ratio.
Flint v. Trolley Stop 843 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Molina v. City of New Orleans 830 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Ploger v. Reese 819 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 11/19/97) , , the appellant's assigned error attacking a jury award for past lost wages was rejected after application of the manifest error standard.
Lofton v. Hayward 806 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Clark v. Burchard 802 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 11/19/97); , 163: Thus, Clement tells us that the allocation of fault is not an exact science, or the search for one precise ratio.
Leaman v. Continental Cas. Co. 798 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Russell v. Evans 763 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 11/19/97), (An award should only be disturbed if it is either so low or so high in proportion to the injury that it “shocks the conscience.”).
Taylor v. Tulane Medical Center 751 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
App. 4 Cir. 11/19/97); -168 , writ den.
Slavich v. Knox 750 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Riley v. Reliance Insurance Company, 97-0445 (La App. 4 Cir. 11/19/97) , Doyle v. McKinney, 98-1102 (La.App.
Johnson v. Rogers & Phillips, Inc. 753 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Doyle v. McKinney 732 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Savarino v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield 730 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
4th Cir.11/19/97); , writ denied, 98-0283 (La.3/20/98); ; (La.App.
Riley v. Reliance Insurance Co. 722 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 11/19/97) , , writ denied, 98-0283 (La.3/20/98), , 1998 WL 290989 .
Rareshide v. Mobil Oil Corp. 719 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Vigh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 706 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 11/19/97); : Thus, Clement tells us that the allocation of fault is not an exact science, or the search for one precise ratio.
Constans v. Choctaw Transport, Inc. 712 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 11/19/97), : Thus, Clement tells us that the allocation of fault is not an exact science, or the search for one precise ration.