DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Constans v. Choctaw Transport, Inc., 712 So. 2d 885.

15 citing documents.

  • Claude and Tammie Aucoin Versus Diaz LLC and Admiral Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
    App. 4 Cir. 12/23/97), (adverse presumption did not apply where truck bumper was photographed and investigated in the weeks following the accident, but thereafter not examined for at least one year and a half before it was eventually replaced in the normal course of business); and also Everhardt v. La.
  • Claude Aucoin and Tammie Aucoin Versus Diaz, LLC and Admiral Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
    App. 4 Cir. 12/23/97), (adverse presumption did not apply where truck bumper was photographed and investigated in the weeks following the accident, but thereafter not examined for at least one year and a half before it was eventually replaced in the normal course of business); and also Everhardt v. La.
  • Scott Thompson v. Kirk Falgout La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 12/23/97), writs denied, 98-0408, 98-0412 (La.
  • Thompson v. Falgout 33 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 12/23/97) , , writs denied, 98-0408, 98-0412 (La.3/27/98), , a case addressing similar facts to those in Nicaud , came to the same conclusion.
  • Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD 978 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 12/23/97), , 902 citing Randolph v. General Motors Corp., 93-1983, p. 12 (La.App.
  • Toups v. Koch Gateway Pipeline, Inc. 915 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • Novosyolova v. Stephens 850 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc. 829 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 12/23/97) , : The cases cited by Allstate indicate apply [sic] the adverse presumption rule should only apply to situations in which the evidence was destroyed or discarded with no remaining photographs under conditions from which one could infer that the party disposing of the evidence was motivated by a desire to dispose of unf
  • Smith v. Jitney Jungle of America 802 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.12/23/97), , writ denied, 98-0408, 98-0412 (La.03/27/98), .
  • Compton v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 796 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 12/23/97) ; , writs denied, 98-408, 98-412 (La.3/27/98); ; In re Peter, 98-701 (La.App.
  • Fryson v. Dupre Transport, Inc. 798 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • Spiro v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 761 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 12/23/97), , writ denied, 98-0408 and 98-0412 (La.3/27/98), .
  • Crane v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. 743 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co. 742 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 12/31/97) , , writ denied 98-0408 (La.3/27/98), .
  • Hooker v. Super Products Corp. 751 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    4th Cir. 12/23/97), ; writ denied, Constans v. Choctaw Transport, Inc., 98-0412 (3/27/98), .