Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Molony v. USAA Property and Cas. Ins. Co., 708 So. 2d 1220.

18 citing documents.

Bianca O. Harts and Willie Shepherd v. Andrew Eugene Downing, Melco Steel, Inc., and Travelers Indemnity Company of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Sherome Hankton v. the State of Louisiana, Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans (University Hospital), Through the … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), -22).
Craft v. Ports Am. Gulfport, Inc. 273 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
McBride v. Lichtenstein 260 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 1221 (citations omitted).
Levy v. Lewis 219 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4 Cir. 3/4/98), (citations omitted).
Gaspard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 155 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 3/4/98) , (stating that the court was satisfied that the reserve amount does not mean the amount over which reasonable minds could not differ, as required by McDill).
Gaunt v. Progressive Security Insurance 92 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this Court articulated that standard as follows: Future medicals need not be established with mathematical certainty although a plaintiff must prove that it is more probable than not that expenses will be incurred.
Cline v. Cheema 85 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this Court articulated that standard as follows: 114Future medicals need not be established with mathematical certainty although a plaintiff must prove that it is more probable than not that expenses will be incurred.
Joseph v. Archdiocese of New Orleans 52 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 1221 9 (citations omitted).
Logan v. Brink's Inc. 16 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
Clarkston v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court addressed the guidelines for awarding future medical expenses: Future medicals need not be established with mathematical certainty although a plaintiff must prove that it is more probable than not that expenses will be incurred ...
Clarkston v. LA. FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. CO. 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court addressed the guidelines for awarding future medical expenses: Future medicals need not be established with mathematical certainty although a plaintiff must prove that it is more probable than not that expenses will be incurred ...
Duncan v. Allstate Insurance 803 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Parker v. Delta Well Surveyors, Inc. 791 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Daniels v. Burridge 785 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/4/98) , 3, -1222 .
Pryor v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC. 729 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Genusa v. Robert 720 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998