Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE, DOTD v. August Christina & Bros., Inc., 716 So. 2d 372.

15 citing documents.

City of Baton Rouge v. Territo 225 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 5th Cir. 2/11/98), .
King v. Allen Court Apartments II 185 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5th Cir.2/11/98), ), “the better course by far is for a trial judge to author any reasons for judgment himself, thereby giving us the benefits of his thoughts and his insights into the litigation under consideration.” “It is one thing for victorious counsel to prepare a judgment comprised of the stark, final determinations of a ca
In re the Succession of Wesley 174 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Jackson v. St. John the Baptist Parish School Board 121 So. 3d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Monteleone 106 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College v. 2330 Palmyra Street, L.L.C. 80 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 2/11/98) , (defendant landowner filed answer and reconventional demand seeking an increase in compensation, severance damages, and delay damages, although failure to award delay damages affirmed on appeal on the facts of the case); State, Dept. of Transp.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Lauricella Land Co. 65 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 2/11/98); , citing State, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App.
Gereighty v. Fox 28 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Davis v. Lazarus 927 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 2/11/98), , as follows: It is elementary that where a case is tried by a jury, that jury is the trier of fact.
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co. 874 So. 2d 90 La. 2004
5th Cir.2/11/98), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/5/99), .
Wagner v. Gleason 840 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Dupre v. Dupre 834 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Rivet v. STATE, DOTD 800 So. 2d 777 La. 2001
5th Cir.2/11/98), ; Zatarain v. WDSU-Television, Inc., 95-2600 (La.App.
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 84 La. 2000
App. 5 Cir. 2/11/98), , the fifth circuit court of appeal held that the trial court committed grave error in granting a new trial on the basis of the evidence being contrary to the law and evidence.
Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5th Cir.2/11/98), , 1998 WL 63834, *3 , the court stated: "We believe that the better course by far is for a trial judge to author any reasons for judgment himself, thereby giving us the benefits of his thoughts and his insights into the litigation under consideration."