DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McInnis Bros. Const., 701 So. 2d 937.

69 citing documents.

  • Lee v. PROFESSIONAL CONST. SERVICES, INC. 982 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    v. McInnis Bros. Const., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Bd. of Sup. v. Louisiana Agr. Finance Auth. 984 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See State, Division of Administration v. McInnis Brothers Construction, 97-0742 p. 9 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Electric Supply Co. v. Great Amer. Ins. Co. 973 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    v. McInnis Bros. Const., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), ; VVP America, Inc. v. Design Build Development Services, Inc., 41,652 (La.App.
  • Dendy v. City Nat. Bank 977 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State of La., Div. of Admin, v. Mclnnis Bros. Constr., 97-0742, p. 4 (La.10/21/97), .
  • VVP America, Inc. v. Design Build Development Services, Inc. 951 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    v. McInnis Bros. Const., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), , Justice Kim-ball explained the longstanding and well-settled principle that lien statutes are strieti juris and must be strictly construed.
  • UNITED RENTALS HIGH. TECH. v. St. Paul Sur. 852 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. McInnis Brothers Construction, 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), , and authorities therein.
  • State Bd. of Ethics v. Ourso 842 So. 2d 346 La. 2003
    State of Louisiana, Division of Administration v. McInnis Bros. Constr., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), (emphasis added).
  • State v. Johnson 846 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    v. McInnis Bros. Const., 97-0742, p. 2 (La.10/21/97); .
  • State Bd. of Ethics v. Ourso 838 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    v. Mcinnis Bros. Const., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), , the supreme court summarized the test employed in distinguishing the doctrines of prescription and preemption as follows: We conclude that "it is the legislative purpose sought to be achieved by a particular limitation period which has been found to be one of the most significant factors in distinguishing perem
  • Davison v. Winford Co., Inc. 827 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State through Div. of Admin, v. McInnis Bros. Constr., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Renfroe v. State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 947 La. 2002
    v. McInnis Brothers Construction, Inc., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Renfroe v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 809 So. 2d 947 La. 2002
    Div. of Admin, v. McInnis Brothers Construction, Inc., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Varner v. Day 806 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State, Division of Administration v. McInnis Brothers Construction, 97-0742, p. 14, n. 10 (La.10/21/97), n. 10 .
  • Orleans Parish Sch. Bd. v. Scheyd, Inc. 737 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    On October 21, 1997, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued State v. McInnis Bros., Const., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), .
  • ACADEMY MORTG. CO., LLC v. Juarez 740 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    v. McInnis Bros. Const., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97) .
  • Milstead v. Jackson Parish School Board 726 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    v. McInnis Bros. Const., 97-0742 (La.10/2/97), ; Lieber v. Caddo Levee Dist.
  • Capitol House v. PERRYMAN CONSULT., INC. 725 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Moreover, this time limitation possesses the characteristics of a peremptive statute as enunciated by the supreme court in State, Division of Administration v. McInnis Brothers Construction, 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), -942 .
  • Evans v. Canadianoxy Offshore Production Co. 730 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    v. McInnis Bros. Const., 97-0742, p. 12 (La.10/21/97); .
  • State, in Interest of Dl 715 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    v. McInnis Bros. Constr., 97-0742 (La.10/21/97), .