State v. Prince
Also decided on this docket: La., September 26, 1997 701 So. 2d 965
State v. Prince, 701 So. 2d 965 (La. 1997).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Kendarrious J. Gant La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
- State v. Trosclair 89 So. 3d 340 La. 2012
- State v. Buckley 839 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- State v. Callegari 773 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Gregrich 745 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- State v. Smith 740 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Lake Charles Dodge v. LeBlanc 641 So. 2d 206
- State v. Patterson 442 So. 2d 442
Opinion text
701 So.2d 965 (1997) STATE of Louisiana v. Thomas E. PRINCE. No. 97-K-0727. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 26, 1997. *966 Granted in part; denied in part. The sentence imposed by the trial court is amended to delete the requirement of restitution. The relevant statutes, La.R.S. 14:27; La.R.S. 14:31; La.R.S.La. 14:44.1, do not authorize a district court to impose restitution in a felony case as part of an executory sentence of imprisonment. State v. Lee, 94-0814 (La. 6/17/94), 641 So.2d 206 ; State v. Patterson, 442 So.2d 442 (La.1983). Compare La.R.S. 14:67.3(F) (authorizing restitution as part of sentence for theft); La.C.Cr.P. art. 895.1 (authorizing restitution as a condition of probation); La.R.S. 15:574.4(J) (authorizing restitution as a condition of parole). In all other respects the application is denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.