Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Chester, 707 So. 2d 973.

23 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Carl J. Webb, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
12/19/97), where the court stated that “jurors may infer the defendant’s guilty knowledge from the circumstances of the offense.” Thus, even without a finding that Defendant stole the .38 revolvers from the victim’s residence, we find the evidence was sufficient to show that Defendant possessed the two .38 revolvers, t
State v. Webb 149 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Chester, 97-1001, p. 3 (La.12/19/97), , where the court stated that “jurors may infer the defendant’s guilty knowledge from the circumstances of the offense.” Thus, even without a finding that Defendant stole the .38 revolvers from the victim’s residence, we find the evidence was sufficient to show that Defendant possessed the two .38 revolvers, that
State v. Woods 91 So. 3d 289 La. 2012
and for the buyer and seller alike, in a transaction involving stolen goods, ‘one of the most telling indices of guilt is a low price paid by the receiver.’” State v. Chester, 97-1001, p. 3 (La.12/19/97), (citing inter alia United States v. Prazak, 623 F.2d 152, 154-55 (10th Cir.1980)) (“Acquisition of recently stolen property at a ridiculously low price from an unknown person is itself sufficient to support an inference that the one acquiring the property knew the property was stolen.”).
State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), .
State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), .
State of Louisiana v. Gary Wayne Woods La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
12/19/97), : In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.”
State v. Woods 84 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
*776 In support of his claim that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, appellate counsel cites the following from State v. Chester, 97-1001, pp. 2-3 (La.12/19/97), , 974: In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.” State v. Walker, 350 So.2
State v. Drake 37 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), .
State of Louisiana v. Zoran Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
12/19/97), the supreme court stated: In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.” State v. Nguye
State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Chester, 97-1001, pp. 2-3 (La.12/19/97), , the supreme court stated: In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.”
State v. Dell 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
12/19/97), (per curiam), stated: In Louisiana, the "mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else."
State v. Calloway 1 So. 3d 417 La. 2009
Although conceding that generally a disproportionately low price paid by the purchaser of stolen goods may support an inference of guilty knowledge, Calloway , 07-0012 at 9, 978 So.2d at 378 (citing State v. Chester, 97-1001, p. 3 (La.12/19/97), ), the majority took into account that defendant was a self-described “unsophisticated buyer” who “had no driver’s license and had never owned or purchased a car before.” Calloway , 07-0012 at 10, 978 So.2d at 379 .
State v. Calloway 978 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In State v. Chester, 97-1001, p. 3 (La.12/19/97), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [J]urors may infer the defendant's guilty knowledge from the circumstances of the offense.
State v. Evans 864 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Chester, 97-1001, p. 1 (La.12/19/97), .
State v. Amin 839 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), ; State v. Jackson, 98-1254 (La.App.
State v. Harbor 775 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
*1085 With regard to the element of guilty knowledge, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), , stated as follows: In Louisiana, the "mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else."
State v. Rogers 772 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), ; State v. Williams, 98-1146 (La.App.
State v. McCadney 761 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court commented on the knowledge element of the crime of possessing stolen things, stating: In Louisiana, the “mere possession of stolen property does not create a presumption that the person in possession of the property received it with knowledge that it was stolen by someone else.” State v.
State v. Carthan 765 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Chester, 97-1001, p. 1 (La.12/19/97); ( (alteration in original)).
State v. Williams 738 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), .
State v. Jackson 733 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Chester, 97-1001, p. 1 (La.12/19/97), ; State v. Hopson, 97-509, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Muneer 733 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
1984); State v. Chester, 97-1001 (La.12/19/97), .
State v. Alexander 720 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Chester, 97-1001, p. 1 (La.12/19/97), ; State v. Hopson, 97-509, p. 3 (La.App.