DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fisher, 720 So. 2d 1179.

112 citing documents.

  • State v. Stanfield 925 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    [5] State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Hollimon 900 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Austin 900 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98), , citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Payne 894 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 7 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Gordon 896 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 7-8 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Long 884 So. 2d 1176 La. 2004
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98); .
  • State v. Kang 866 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [2] State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), [3] Id.
  • State v. Bradley 867 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In support he cites State v. Fisher 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), where the court stated: The determination of whether an arrest occurred depends on the totality of the circumstances, but several factors distinguish an arrest from lesser infringements on personal liberty.
  • State v. Massey 866 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Accord, State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 5 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Peterson 868 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Gurganus 864 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 4 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Franklin 858 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Sims 845 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [6] State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Saltzman 843 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98); .
  • State v. Thompson 842 So. 2d 330 La. 2003
    State v. Fischer, 97-1133 (La.1998), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 841 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [17] State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 5 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Pham 839 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Hickerson 838 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Kirk 833 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Hills 829 So. 2d 1027 La. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 11-12 (La.9/9/98), -86 .
  • State v. Parfait 831 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Handy 828 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), -1183 , the Court divided encounters between police and citizens into three "tiers" and described the lowest tier of interaction between the police and citizens: In United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895 , 897 n. 1 (5th Cir.1992), cert.
  • State v. Sears 823 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 7-8 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Graham 820 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    The Louisiana Supreme Court adopted a three-tier analysis of interactions between citizens and police officers under the Fourth Amendment in State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Hill 821 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See also, State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), ("[M]ere communications between officers and citizens implicate no Fourth Amendment concerns where there is no coercion or detention.").
  • State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Howard 814 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 5 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Lumpkin 813 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. London 815 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Butler 812 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [9] State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 5-6 (La.9/9/98), , (citing United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895, 897, n. 1 (5th Cir. 1992)).
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98), , the Supreme Court discussed the factors to evaluate when the police rely on a tip from a confidential informant: |7While probable cause must be determined on the totality of the circumstances, an informant’s reliability, veracity and basis of knowledge are “all highly relevant.” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213
  • State v. Bowen 806 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    App. 4 Cir. 4/2/97), , rev'd on other grounds and remanded, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), ), [5] Id.
  • State v. McDaniels 803 So. 2d 966 La. 2001
    See State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), ("[M]ere communications between officers and citizens implicate no Fourth Amendment concerns where there is no coercion or detention.") (citations omitted).
  • State v. Diaz 800 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), , the Louisiana Supreme addressed the issue of the admissibility of a defendant’s statement.
  • State v. Smith 785 So. 2d 815 La. 2001
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 12 (La.9/9/98), (ordering suppressed defendant's statements made in response to police questioning in patrol unit on the way to the station house, and his subsequent spontaneous admission that the victim "got what he deserved"); see also United States v. Robinson, 932 F.Supp.
  • State v. Davis 786 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [3] Reversed on other grounds, 97-1133(La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Howard 786 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [2] Reversed on other grounds, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Harris 786 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Haywood 783 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1154 (La.App.
  • State v. Julian 785 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Frosch 787 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), ; Creecy, supra.
  • State v. Marler 797 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), -1183 .
  • State v. Kirk 773 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98), ( cert.
  • State v. Davis 768 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), ; State v. Williams, supra, 735 So.2d at 72.
  • State v. Womack-Grey 764 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In support of her claim, defendant cites State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Smith 761 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Collor 762 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    The defense relies on State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), for the proposition that in addition to the legality of the arrest and the presence of a valid waiver of rights, the court must look at other factors to determine whether a confession is admissible.
  • State v. Flagg 760 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), ; State v. Williams, supra, 735 So.2d at 72 .