Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anderson, 707 So. 2d 1223.

70 citing documents.

State v. Lewis 917 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
However, "`[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'" State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Couvillion 910 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 9/25/01) , , writ denied, 01-2967 (La.10/14/02), (quoting State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), ).
State v. Hall 875 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
However, "`it is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'" State v. Kirkland, supra at 269 , quoting State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Fields 842 So. 2d 316 La. 2003
14:24; State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (“Acting in concert each man then became responsible not only for his own acts but for the acts of the other”).
State v. Wix 838 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Smith, 98-2078, p. 7 (La.10/29/99), , quoting 2 LaFave & Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 7.5, p. 212, and citing State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
[9] State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), ("Acting in concert, each man then became responsible not only for his own acts but for the acts of the other.").
State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
It unquestionably occurred while the defendant was engaged in armed robbery."); State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3, (La.2/6/98), ("Acting in concert, each man then became responsible not only for his own acts, but for the acts of the other.").
State v. Logan 822 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), ; State v. Kirkland, supra .
State v. Hicks 817 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[8] Cedrington, supra at 576 ( quoting State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), ).
State v. Johnson 817 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
See State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98); , (La.App.
State v. Hayes 806 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Cedrington, supra, at 573 , 576 (quoting State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), ).
State v. Kirkland 798 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Randall 776 So. 2d 424 La. 2000
State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), ("Acting in concert, each man then became responsible not only for his own acts but for the acts of the other."); State v. Reynolds, 209 La.
State v. Nichols 772 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Brooks 769 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[14] State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), ; writ denied, 98-1374 (La.10/9/98), .
State v. Myers 760 So. 2d 310 La. 2000
14:24; State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 5 (La.02/06/98); .
State v. Gaspard 746 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Smith 748 So. 2d 1139 La. 1999
2 La-Fave and Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 7.5, p. 212; see also State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), ("Acting in concert, each man then became responsible not only for his own acts but for the acts of the other.").
State v. Edwards 746 So. 2d 1267 La. 1999
14:24 (all persons “concerned” in the commission of a crime are principals); State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (“Acting in concert, each [perpetrator] [becomes] responsible not only for his own acts but for the acts of the other.”); -18 (La.1987) (“Even if, as claimed, defendant did not personally pull the ^trigger, his presence and assistance up to this point provided a basis from whic
State v. Anderson 714 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98); .