Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boyd, 710 So. 2d 1074.

15 citing documents.

The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a … La. 2023
The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. The Louisiana Board of Ethics La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Michael Calvin Duhon -Aka- Michael C. Duhon -Aka- Michael Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
710, 42 L.Ed.2d 706 (1975); State v. Boyd, 97-0579 (La.4/14/98)
State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4/14/98), but points out that the Boyd court addressed the vagueness of the term “medical attention” and did not evaluate whether a particular injury “required” medical attention: 20 The complained of phrase has an easily understood meaning within the cont
State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Defense counsel acknowledges that the case law has, on occasion, extended the meaning of “requires” to encompass situations where medical attention was “recommended.” Defense counsel cites State v. Boyd, 97-579, pp. 3-5 (La.4/14/98), , but points out that the Boyd court addressed the vagueness of the term “medical attention” and did not evaluate whether a particular injury “required” medical attention: | ;>iThe complained of phrase has an easily understood meaning within the context of its us
Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, LLC v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 978 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Hines 970 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Boyd, 97-579 (La.4/14/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Henrietta Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
[a] defendant [therefore] may not establish that a statute is unconstitutionally vague by speculating about hypothetical conduct which could also be prosecuted under the same statute.” State v. Hair, 00-2694, p. 5 (La.5/15/01), ) (citing State v. Boyd, 97-0579, p. 2 (La.4/14/98), ) (“[A] vagueness challenge to a statute must be examined in the light of the facts of the 16 case .
State v. Williams 953 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Hair, 00-2694, p. 5 (La.5/15/01), ) (citing State v. Boyd, 97-0579, p. 2 (La.4/14/98), ) ("[A] vagueness challenge to a statute must be examined in the light of the facts of the case .
State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
State v. Boyd, 97-579, p. 3 (La.4/14/98), .
State v. Interiano 868 So. 2d 9 La. 2004
State v. Hair, 00-2694, p. 5 (La.5/15/01), ) (citing State v. Boyd, 97-0579, p. 2 (La.4/14/98), ) ("[A] vagueness challenge to a statute must be examined in the light of the facts of the case ...
State v. Breaux 829 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
14:34.2 in State v. Boyd, 97-0579 (La.4/14/98), .
State v. Gaspard 820 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Defendant relies on the Louisiana Supreme Court's holding in State v. Boyd, 97-0579 (La.4/14/98), , to support his argument that the State did not provide strong evidence of actual guilt.
State v. Ahlfeldt 801 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Boyd, 97-0579, pp. 3-4 (La.4/14/98); , the supreme court wrote: We find that the clear and unambiguous wording of the statute means that any battery of a police officer which necessitates that the officer seek the care of doctors, nurses or other medical services, including but not limited to operations, hospitals, and institutional care incurred p
State v. Hair 784 So. 2d 1269 La. 2001
In addition, the State asks this court to determine whether the defendants can properly challenge a statute for vagueness in a pretrial motion to quash the indictment in light of this court's holding in State v. Boyd, 97-0579 (La.4/14/98), .