Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gradley, 745 So. 2d 1160.

26 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
5/19/98), State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.
State v. Myles 186 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Gradley, 97-0641, p. 9-10 (La.5/19/98), (citing State v. Vessell, 450, So.2d 938, 943 (La.1984)).
State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 703(D); State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), .
State v. Lewis 126 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
15:451 provides: “[b]efore what purports to be a confession can be introduced in evidence, it must be affirmatively shown that it was free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises.” See State v. Gradley, 97-0641, p. 9 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Butler, 2004-0880, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Barabin 124 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
15:451 provides: “Before what [purports] to be a confession can be introduced in evidence, it must |Bbe affirmatively shown that it was free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises.” See State v. Gradley, 97-0641, p. 9 (La.5/19/98), .
State v. Wilson 119 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
15:451 provides: “Before what purports to be a confession can be introduced in evidence, it must be affirmatively shown that it was free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises.” See State v. Gradley, 97-641, p. 9 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Butler, 04-880, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Gilmore 156 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
15:451 provides: “Before what purports to be a confession can be introduced in evidence, it must be affirmatively shown that it was free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises.” See State v. Gradley, 97-641, p. 9 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Butler, 04-880, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
See State v. Holmes, 06-2988 (La.12/2/08), ; State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), ; State v. Blank, 04-0204 (La.4/11/07), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Wi
State v. LeBlanc 76 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 703(D); State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), .
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
97-0641, p. 14 (La.5/19/98); -69 .
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
420 , 145 L.Ed.2d 328 (1999); State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), , cert.
State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
15:451; see State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Butler, 04-0880 (La.App.
State v. Davis 30 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 703(D); State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), .
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
420 , 145 L.Ed.2d 328 (1999); State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), , cert.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
In State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), (unpub'd appx), this Court observed that "[t]he legislature has recognized that the very young and those over the age of sixty-five are more vulnerable and less able to defend themselves than members of other age groups."
State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
art. 703(D); State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), .
State v. Butler 894 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
15:451; State v. Gradley, 97-0641, p. 9 (La.5/19/98), ; see also State in Interest of J.M., 99-1271, p. 2 (La.App.
State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
1983); State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Roy, 95-0638 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; and State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (5/19/98), (Unpub.Appx.
State v. Williams 804 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See State v. Gradley, 97-0641, p. 10 (La.5/19/98), .
State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98)
State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
See State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98); .
State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98)
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
See State v. Gradley, 97-0641, (La.5/19/98), (testimony of various family members about how they found the victim's body hidden in a closet with a chest of drawers blocking the closet door entrance, and the impact of that sight on them at the time, did not constitute "victim impact" testimony but simply provided jurors with relevant evidence about crime scene an
State v. Perez 745 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
See State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), .
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
Defendant acknowledges that this is the very tape and the very same issue that this Court recently addressed in the appeal of his severed co-defendant, State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98); .