Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bentley, 728 So. 2d 405.

17 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Jeremy James Griner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 10/ 21/ 98), writ denied, 98- 3213 La.
State v. Duncan 15 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , , this Court found sufficient evidence to support convictions for possession of drugs with the intent to distribute based merely upon the amount of drugs seized, even though in no case did the officers involved observe any suspected transactions, nor did the State present any expert testimony in these cases to in
State v. Davis 958 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , the police observed the defendant acting suspiciously in an area of high narcotics trafficking.
State v. Handy 925 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , 410: [I]t is well-settled that police officers do not need probable cause to arrest or reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop every time they approach a citizen in public.
State v. Coleman 828 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , , this Court held that any error in failing to observe the twenty-four hour delay in sentencing after the denial of a motion for new trial did not prejudice a defendant whose original sentence was vacated, and he was then found to be a habitual offender.
State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , *274 , writ denied 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), (failure to observe twenty-four hour delay after denial of motion for new trial did not prejudice defendant where sentence later vacated and habitual offender sentence imposed).
State v. Jones 773 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4th Cir. 10/21/98), , 410 writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), .
State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), .
State v. Guy 775 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), .
State v. Smith 761 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 th Cir. 10/21/98), , this court stated that once the arrested officer noticed the white substance in the defendant’s mouth, he had probable cause to arrest the defendant.
State v. Press 767 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), : [I]t is well-settled that police officers do not need probable cause to arrest or reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop every time they approach a citizen in public.
State v. Sam 761 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , , writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), , this court held that any error in failing to observe the twenty-four hour delay in sentencing after the denial of a motion for new trial did not prejudice a defendant whose original sentence was vacated and he was then found to be a habitual offender.
State v. Schaffer 767 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), .
State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), .
State v. Tyler 749 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , 410 writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), .
State v. Mims 752 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , writ denied, 98-3213 (La.5/7/99), .
State v. Jefferson 735 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , 1998 WL 790691 , , this court held that any error in failing to observe the 24-hour delay in sentencing after the denial of a motion for new trial did not prejudice a defendant whose original sentence was vacated and he was then found to be a habitual offender.