DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Finch, 730 So. 2d 1020.

22 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Travis Boys La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99), )).
  • State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99), , 1025-26, set forth the applicable law on this issue and opined: When a witness refers directly or indirectly to another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant, as to which evidence is not admissible, the defendant's remedy is a request for an admonition or a mistrial pursuant to La.C.Cr.P
  • State v. Parker 112 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , -28 ).
  • State v. Juengain 41 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 2/24/99), -1028 (where a minimum sentence does not transcend constitutional limits, it may not be reformed by this Court merely because it seems harsh).
  • State v. Williams 932 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , this Court discussed the harshness of mandatory sentences as follows: |RWhere a minimum sentence does not transcend constitutional limits, it may not be reformed by this Court merely because it seems harsh.
  • State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 2/24/99), -1026 .
  • State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99), , commented that "[w]here a minimum sentence does not transcend constitutional limits, it may not be reformed by this Court merely because it seems harsh.
  • State v. Moore 809 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Daniel 811 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , (Judge Jones, dissenting).
  • State v. Davis 801 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Finch, 97-2060 (La.App 4 Cir. 2/24/99), , writ denied, 99-1240 (La.10/8/99), , writ denied, 99-1300 (La.10/8/99), ; State v. Long, 97-2434 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 788 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99), , this court declined to extend Burns to a case where there was no evidence that the defendant was driven by his addiction to sell drugs to support his drug habit, and where the record was devoid of any testimony suggesting that the defendant might possess any redeeming virtues.
  • State v. Briscoe 779 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , writs denied, 99-1240 (La.10/8/99), and 99-1300 (La.
  • State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.2/24/99), , writs denied, 99-1240, 99-1300 (La.10/8/99), , 963.
  • State v. Jason 779 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , writs denied 99-1240 (La.10/8/99), and 99-1300 (La.10/8/99), ; State v. Francis, 96-2389 (La.App.
  • State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , writs denied, 99-1240, 99-1300 (La.10/8/99), , 963, this court declined to extend Burns to a case where there was no evidence that the defendant was driven by his addiction to sell drugs to support his drug habit, and where the record was devoid of any testimony suggesting that the defendant might poss
  • State v. Baker 772 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , writ denied 99-1240 (La.10/8/99), .
  • State v. Alford 765 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , and State v. Long, 97-2434 (La.App.
  • State v. Bazile 762 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/24/99), , (Judge Jones dissenting), this Court declined to extend Burns to a case where the record was devoid of any testimony suggesting that the twenty-three year old defendant might possess any redeeming virtues.
  • State v. Windham 748 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Martello 748 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , this court declined to extend Burns to a case where there was no evidence that the defendant was driven by his addiction to sell drugs to support his drug habit, and where the record was devoid of any testimony suggesting that the defendant might possess any redeeming virtues.
  • State v. Warren 742 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , 1026-1027: Even though a sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is the minimum provided by that statute, the sentence may still be unconstitutionally excessive if it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment, or is nothing more than the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering and is gr
  • State v. Long 744 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 2/24/99) , , this court declined to extend Burns to a case where there was no evidence that the defendant was driven by his addiction to sell drugs to support his drug habit, and the record was devoid of any testimony suggesting that the defendant might possess any redeeming virtues.