Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ash, 729 So. 2d 664.

68 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Simuel Shaw Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
  • State v. Galle 267 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State v. Williams 240 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99), , 669.
  • State v. Chambers 212 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Amos 192 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), *833 669 .
  • State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Ansah 147 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Edgar 140 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Smith 101 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Jones 99 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Green 84 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Duncan 15 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , and State v. Bentley, 97-1552 (La.App.
  • State v. Major 1 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Bradley 995 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Galindo 968 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Davis 958 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , several police officers were on patrol when they witnessed the defendant standing on a street corner holding his hand out to an unnamed female.
  • State v. Jackson 947 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), ; McGee , XXXX-XXXX at p. 5, 758 So.2d at 342 .
  • State v. Reichard 935 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Phillips 891 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , this Court articulated the standard of review that is applicable to a claim that the evidence produced at a criminal trial was constitutionally insufficient to support a conviction.
  • State v. Nunnery 891 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , this Court articulated the standard of review that is applicable to a claim that | nthe evidence produced at a criminal trial was constitutionally insufficient to support a conviction.
  • State v. Lewis 885 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him of violating La.
  • State v. Woods 830 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Johnson 817 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Harris 815 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Landry 804 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99), -68 , this Court set forth the standard of review applicable to a claim that the evidence produced was constitutionally insufficient to support a conviction: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Broyard 802 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Dunbar 798 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , this court set forth the standard of review applicable to a claim that, the evidence produced was constitutionally insufficient to support a conviction: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the l
  • State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Jason 787 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Cojoe 785 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), -68 [2] , this court set forth the standard of review applicable to a claim that the evidence produced was constitutionally insufficient to support a conviction: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in
  • State v. Robichaux 788 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, *92 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir.2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), -68 , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Briscoe 779 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 *37 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4th Cir.2/10/99), -68 , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review applicable when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate cou
  • State v. Ballansaw 769 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), -668 , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99) , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate c