Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 744 So. 2d 165.

27 citing documents.

State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 9/8/99), , 169 ), this Court declared if there is no physical evidence to link a defendant to a crime, "the testimony of one witness, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual conclusion" and the "jury's credibility decision should not be disturbed unless it is clearly contrary to the evid
State v. McClendon 228 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4 Cir. 9/8/99), , writ denied, 99-3141 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Larry Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry James Broussard Jr. AKA Larry J, Broussard Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Broussard 202 So. 3d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Handy 156 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/8/99), (stating that “[t]he essence of burglary ...
State v. Ramirez 154 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/8/99), ); see also State v. Robinson, 2002-1869, p. 16 (La.4/14/04), (citing State v. White, 28,095 (La.App.2d Cir.5/8/96), ).
State v. Smith 141 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 9/8/99), writ denied, 99-3141 (La.
State v. Jones 105 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 9/8/99), , writ denied, 99-3141 (La.4/7/00), , explained, “The essence of burglary ...
State v. Winston 100 So. 3d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hawkins 78 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Payton 68 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. SWANZY 61 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Watts 41 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Preston 40 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 9/8/99), , writ denied, 99-3141 (La.4/7/00), .
State v. Stephens 27 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. James 988 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 9/8/99), , 169 as follows: *810 The relevant inquiry when reviewing a conviction for the sufficiency of the evidence is whether, upon viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Shaw 987 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Simmons 983 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
4 Cir. 9/8/99), , writ denied, 99-3141 (La.4/7/00), ; State v. Ford, 28,724 (La.App.
State v. Wright 840 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
4th Cir.9/8/99), , writ denied, 99-3141 (La.4/7/00), .
State v. Hurst 828 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. McZeal 779 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/8/99), , writ denied, 99-3141 (La.4/7/00), .
State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/8/99) , , writ denied, 99-3141 (La.4/7/00), , the defendant was convicted of forcible rape, aggravated battery, attempted forcible rape and simple burglary, involving two different victims living in the same house.
State v. Marshall 774 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/8/99), , writ denied, 99-3141 (La.4/7/00), .