Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Winfrey, 703 So. 2d 63.

108 citing documents.

State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 10/28/97), , even though the defendant had failed to state his objection in a written response to the habitual offender bill, we considered defendant's habitual offender claim "in the interests of justice or, judicial economy,” In our more recent opinions, however, we have required compliance with R.S.
State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 10/28/97), , even though the defendant had failed to state his objection in a written response to the habitual offender bill, we considered defendant's habitual offender claim "in the interests of justice or judicial economy," In our more recent opinions, however, we have required compliance with R.S.
State v. Rochon 733 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 10/28/97), , writ denied, 98-0264 (La.6/19/98), .
State v. R.W. 721 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Calloway 718 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Carter 712 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
App. 5 Cir. 10/28/97), ; State v. Conrad, supra This assignment of error is of no merit.
State v. Smith 710 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 10/28/97) , ; State v. Pendelton, 96-367 (La.App.