Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hollins, 704 So. 2d 307.

13 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Ryk Frickey La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 11/25/97), writ denied, 99-507 (La.
State v. Harris 235 So. 3d 1354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 11/25/97); , writ denied, 99-507 (La.
State v. Neely 171 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 11/25/97) , , writ denied, 99-0507 (La.8/25/99), .
State v. Mills 120 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 11/25/97) , , the court found that evidence of an officer’s suspension was inadmissible for impeachment purposes because it did not involve a conviction.
State v. Adams 119 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 11/25/97) , , *54 writ denied, 99-0507 (La.8/25/99), .
State v. Dorsey 94 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/25/97), , writ denied, 99-507 (La.8/25/99), .
State v. Abdul 94 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/25/97), , writ denied, 99-507 (La.8/25/99), .
State v. Simmons 85 So. 3d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/25/97) , , the court found that evidence of an officer’s suspension was inadmissible for impeachment purposes because it did not involve a conviction.
State v. Gorman 88 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/25/97) , , writ denied, 99-507 (La.8/25/99), .
State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/25/97), , writ denied, 99-0507 (La.8/25/99), (finding that evidence of arresting officer’s suspension was inadmissible for impeachment *375 purposes because it did not involve a conviction).
State v. Pleasant 66 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 11/25/97) , (the court found that evidence of an officer’s suspension was inadmissible for impeachment purposes because it did not involve a conviction.
State v. Thompson 10 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 11/25/97) , (the court found that evidence of an officer’s suspension was inadmissible for impeachment purposes because it did not involve a conviction.
State v. Charles 790 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5th Cir.11/25/97), ; writ denied, 99-507 (La.8/25/99), , which dealt with a similar factual situation, this Court stated: The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right of the accused in a criminal prosecution `to be confronted with the witnesses against him.'