Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Orman, 704 So. 2d 245.

39 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Epps La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
1/9/98), (emphasis added).
State of Louisiana Versus Donte C Mitchell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Ronald L. Barber La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Carlos Miranda Fernandez La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Percy J. Prestenbach La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
01/09/98), (per curiam).
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Rachal La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Damari Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
11 State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98)
State of Louisiana v. Damari Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Orman, 97–2089, pp. 1–2 (La.1/9/98)
State of Louisiana v. Zachary Derel Mosley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Robert Neal Green, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
d negating all possible defenses, but rather whether the strength of the factual basis, coupled with the other circumstances of the plea, reflect that the plea “represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative[s].” State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Damari Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
The supreme court in State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), explained the test for determining whether the factual basis is sufficient: [T]he standard under Alford is not whether the state may prevail at trial by establishing the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and negating all possible defenses, but rather whether the
State of Louisiana v. Marc Q. Scroggins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Bowman 262 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/9/98), ( per curiam ).
State v. Scroggins 260 So. 3d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Nelson 248 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Jackson 245 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/9/98), ( per curium ); State v. Villarreal , 99-827 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Lorrie A. Anderson AKA Lorrie Ann Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
ements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and negating all possible defenses, but rather whether the strength of the factual basis, coupled with the other circumstances of the plea, reflect that the plea “represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative[s].” State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State v. Anderson 214 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State v. Hayes 173 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Orman, 97-2089 (La.1/9/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone A. Murray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98)
State of Louisiana v. Frank Allen Fregia, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98)
State v. Fregia 105 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
ements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and negating all possible defenses, but rather whether the strength of the factual basis, coupled with the other circumstances of the plea, reflect that the plea “represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative[s].” State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
ements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and negating all possible defenses, but rather whether the strength of the factual basis, coupled with the other circumstances of the plea, reflect that the plea “represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative[s].” State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State v. Guilbeau 71 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
whether the state may prevail at trial by establishing the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and negating all possible defenses, but rather whether the strength of the factual basis, coupled with the other circumstances of the plea, reflect that the plea “represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative[s].” State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State v. Guilbeau 71 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
whether the state may prevail at trial by establishing the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and negating all possible defenses, but rather whether the strength of the factual basis, coupled with the other circumstances of the plea, reflect that the plea “represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative[s].” State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. J.S. 63 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), .
State v. Stevenson 41 So. 3d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Orman, 1997-2089 (La.01/09/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Juane Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
ements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and negating all possible defenses, but rather whether the strength of the factual basis, coupled with the other circumstances of the plea, reflect that the plea “represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative[s].” State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State v. Moss 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State v. Johnson 3 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Oman, 97-2089 (La.1/9/98), (per curiam).
State v. Estes 956 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Orman, 1997-2089 (La.1/9/98), .
State v. Orman 925 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
P. art. 930.8 began to run upon the reinstatement of the applicant’s conviction and sentence in State v. Orman, 1997-2089 (La.1/9/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Gregory Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State v. Johnson 893 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Orman, 97-2089, pp. 1-2 (La.1/9/98), (citations omitted).
State v. Francis 832 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
1/9/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court considered a plea purportedly entered under the qualifications of Alford , and concluded that circumstances of the plea did not preserve the plea.
State v. Villarreal 759 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Orman, 97-2089 (La.1/9/98), .
State v. Hawkins 715 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
See, State v. Orman, 97-2089 (La.1/9/98), .