Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carlin v. Cain, 706 So. 2d 968.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Brandon Barnes La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
3/13/98), (appellate courts may raise the time bar of La.
State of Louisiana Versus Keith Johnson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
3/13/98), (appellate courts may raise the time bar of La.
Christina Lambert Versus Christopher Stinson, Warden, Louisiana Transitional Center for Women La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Wilfred Greenup La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
3/13/98), (appellate courts may raise the time-bar of La.
State ex rel. Lavergne v. State 178 So. 3d 559 La. 2015
See Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), .
State ex rel. Cerda-Anima v. State 177 So. 3d 1056 La. 2015
See Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), .
Jones v. Cain 151 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 930.8(B); Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Lanieu, 03-2640 (La.10/1/04), ; see also Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 695 , 124 S.Ct.
STATE EX REL. HILLS v. State 54 So. 3d 1109 La. 2011
art. 930.8(B), which authorize the dismissal of any timely-filed application or one filed under any of the statutory exceptions to the time bar when the state shows that delay has prejudiced its ability to respond to the application as the result of events not within its control....” Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Allen 55 So. 3d 757 La. 2011
[and] even if exculpatory material was at some time ‘knowable,’ an application based Ron it may still qualify under the new facts exception to the time bar.” Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390, pp. 1-2 (La.3/13/98), at 968-69 .
Timothy J. Guidry v. J. Phil Haney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Guidry v. Haney 999 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. TSOLAINOS 997 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), (per curiam).
State v. Orman 925 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Carlin v. Cain, 1997-2390 (La.3/13/98), , found that the exception to the three-year [now two-year] time bar provided by for La.
State ex rel. Walker v. State 920 So. 2d 213 La. 2006
art. 930.8(B); Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Lanieu, 03-2640 (La.10/1/04), ; see also Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 695 , 124 S.Ct.
State v. Kenner 900 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Despite this, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued a per curiam in Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), , in which it explicitly stated that La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Lanieu 885 So. 2d 512 La. 2004
See generally Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), .
State ex rel. Boudreaux v. State 750 So. 2d 977 La. 1999
art. 930.8(A)(1); Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Rice v. State 749 So. 2d 650 La. 1999
The district judge did not abuse his discretion, see generally Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), , in finding relator's failure to raise his claims in earlier applications for post-conviction relief inexcusable and in defaulting relator's most recent application for this reason.
State ex rel. Magee v. State 747 So. 2d 6 La. 1999
art. 930.8(A)(1); Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), ; State ex rel Cormier v. State, 98-2111 (La.12/18/98), .
State ex rel. Cormier v. State 731 So. 2d 274 La. 1998
See also Carlin v. Cain, 97-2390 (La.3/13/98), ; State ex rel.