DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sevario v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp., 752 So. 2d 221.

14 citing documents.

  • Goza v. Parish of West Baton Rouge 21 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1st Cir.11/10/99), , writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00), , and writs not considered, 99-3638, 00-0044 (La.4/7/00), , 82.
  • Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 9 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1 Cir. 11/10/99) , -231 , writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00), , writ not consid *945 ered, 99-3638 (La.4/7/00), , writ not considered, 2000-0044 (La.4/7/00), .
  • Linda Daigle Anhorn v. Bruce L. Anhorn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 11/10/99), -27, writ denied, 99-3457 (La.
  • Anhorn v. Anhorn 899 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 11/10/99), -27 , writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00), writs not considered, 99-3638, and 00-44 (La.4/7/00), , stated: The trial court should consider the diligence and good faith of the movant and other reasonable grounds.
  • Simms v. Progressive Ins. Co. 883 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    1st Cir.11/10/99), , writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00), , and writ not considered, 99-3638 (La.4/7/00), and XXXX-XXXX (La.4/7/00), , awarding $35,000 to husband whose wife underwent multiple surgeries for pelvic, femur, and foot fractures.
  • Cooper v. Public Belt Railroad 839 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1 Cir. 1/10/99), , writ denied, 1999-3457 (La.4/7/00), , and writs not considered, 1999-3638 & 2000-0044 (La.4/7/00), , 82, for the proposition that PBR’s experts should not be allowed to render an opinion based on these privileged documents.
  • Darbone v. State 815 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    App. 1 Cir. 11/10/99); -232 , writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00); (footnote omitted).
  • St. Tammany Parish Hosp. v. Burris 804 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1st Cir. 11/10/99), , writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00), , writs not considered, 99-3638 and 00-0044 (La.4/7/00), and 82.
  • Cox v. Moore 805 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    1 Cir. 11/10/99) ; -32 , writs not considered, 99-3638, 00-44 (La.4/7/00); , 82, writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00); (citations omitted).
  • Odom v. City of Lake Charles 790 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    1 Cir. 11/10/99) ; -32 , writs not considered, 99-3638 (La.4/7/00), ,, 00-0044 (La.4/7/00); 759 S.2d 82, writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00); (footnote omitted).
  • Palacios v. LOUISIANA AND DELTA RAILROAD, INC. 775 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    1 Cir. 11/10/99) ; , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/7/00); .
  • Armand v. Delgado 770 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    1st Cir.11/10/99), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/7/00), .
  • Brow v. Allstate Indemnity Co. 771 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    1 Cir. 11/10/99) , , writs not considered, 99-3638, 00-0044 (La.4/7/00), and 82, writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00), .
  • Whitcraft v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 771 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    1 Cir. 11/10/99) , , units not considered, 99-3638, , 00-0044 (La.4/7/00), and 82, writ denied, 99-3457 (La.4/7/00), .