Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaylord Chemical Corp. v. ProPump, Inc., 753 So. 2d 349.
- Nielson v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 167 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
Beverly E. Ledet v. John J. Campo, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
1st Cir. 2/18/00), Smith v. Terrebonne Parish Consol.
- Hawkins v. Fowler 92 So. 3d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Mangerchine v. Reaves 63 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
Ricks v. KENTWOOD OIL CO., INC.
38 So. 3d 363
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 1st Cir.2/18/00), .
- Harris v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 35 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
Stewart Contractors v. Metalpro Indus.
969 So. 2d 653
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 2/18/00), , for the proposition that Stewart's claims against MetalPro do not constitute claims for "property damage," which would trigger coverage of the Nautilus policy, is likewise misplaced.
- Halphen v. Borja 961 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Andrews v. COLUMBIA CAS. INS. CO. 960 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Huggins v. Gerry Lane Enterprises, Inc. 950 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Rager v. Bourgeois 951 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
North Amer. Treat. Sys. v. Scottsdale Ins.
943 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1st Cir.2/18/00), , the insurer made the same argument as Scottsdale does here: that the failure to meet a contractual obligation to provide a workmanlike product does not constitute an "occurrence" under a CGL policy.
-
Thibodaux v. Arthur Rutenberg Homes, Inc.
928 So. 2d 80
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 2/18/00), , this court analyzed the same definition of "occurrence" relied on by Maryland in the case before us, and applied it to a defectively manufactured product.
- Broadmoor Anderson v. NAT. UNION FIRE INS. 912 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras America 898 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
- Doe v. Breedlove 906 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- MacHen v. Bivens 906 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-
Doe v. Breedlove
906 So. 2d 577
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
1st Cir.2/18/00), , and hold *579 that the unexpected nature of an “occurrence,” like that of an “accident,” must be considered from the viewpoint of the victim, rather than the insured.
- McMath Const. Co., Inc. v. Dupuy 897 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-
Collins v. Farris
897 So. 2d 634
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1st Cir.2/18/00), ; Smith v. Terrebonne Parish Consol.
- Graves v. Garden State Life Ins. 887 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp. 878 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-
Rando v. Top Notch Properties, LLC
879 So. 2d 821
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 2/18/00) , , the first circuit adopted the same reasoning as was used in Massey and Sandifer, supra, based on McKenzie and Johnson, but noted the following important additional concept: Accident is defined from the viewpoint of the victim; losses that were unforeseen and unexpected by the victim are the result of an accident.
- Wallace v. First Assur. Life of America 862 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp.
867 So. 2d 723
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
App. 1 Cir. 2/18/00), ; Hubbs v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 98-2570 (La.
-
Smith v. TERREBONNE PARISH CONSOL. GOV'T.
858 So. 2d 671
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Gaylord Chemical Corporation v. ProPump, Inc., (La.App.
- PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P. v. U.S. Filter/Arrowhead, Inc. 834 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Miller v. SUPERIOR SHIPYARD AND FABRICATION 836 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Pcs Nitrogen Fert. v. US filter/arrowhead 834 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Arnette v. NPC Services, Inc. 808 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Herzog Contracting Corp. v. Oliver
805 So. 2d 313
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
1st Cir.02/18/00), , the defendant gave incorrect information regarding the capabilities of a product it sold to the plaintiff.
- Robinson v. Heard 800 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- Agricredit Acceptance Co. v. Singleton 767 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000