DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jordan, 716 So. 2d 36.

63 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams 839 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Ballou 838 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. DEBECHE 815 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Foshee 756 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Myers 753 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 6/3/98) ; , this court recognized that the defendant had not filed a motion to withdraw his plea but nonetheless addressed the claims raised by Jordan due to the constitutional nature of the argument.
  • State v. Whiddon 741 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 6/3/98) , , addressed the validity of a defendant's guilty plea due to the constitutional nature of the Defendant's argument that his plea was not knowingly and intelligently entered, although the validity of the plea was raised for the first time on appeal because he did not file a motion to withdraw the guilty plea in the tri
  • State v. Larrivere 733 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 6/3/98) ; , this court chose to review the defendant's sentence because at the time of his guilty plea, the defendant was informed only that he was waiving his right to appeal his conviction, not that he was generally waiving all rights to appeal.
  • State v. Pickens 741 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Sepulvado 737 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Butler 734 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 6/3/98) ; , and State v. Gobert, 98-42 (La.App.
  • State v. Underwood 724 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 6/3/98) , , this court addressed the applicability of Article 881.2(A)(2) to a situation factually similar to the present case.
  • State v. Coco 723 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 6/3/98) , ; State v. Goodman, 96-376 (La.App.
  • State v. Gobert 720 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 6/3/98) , ; wherein we determined that, since the statute did not clearly indicate that review was prohibited, the sentence should be reviewed in the interest of justice.