Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Broussard v. FA Richard & Associates, Inc., 732 So. 2d 578.

18 citing documents.

Lawrence Steven Mopsik v. Kristina Angelina Galjour La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Lisette Schroth Morice Versus Yorkshire Court Condominium Association, Inc., Gary Klein, Alex A. Lauricella, and Didriksen, Saucier & … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 3 Cir. 3/17/99), writ denied, 99-1048 (La.
GANNETT RIVER STATES PUBLISHING CORPORATION D/B/A DAILY ADVERTISER VERSUS 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY DONALD D. LANDRY La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 3/17/99), writ denied, 99-1048 (La.
Robin Murphy v. MKS Plastics, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. 3rd Cir. 3/ 17/ 99), - 85, writ denied, 99- 1048 ( La.
Edwards ex rel. Edwards v. Parkerson 218 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 03/17/99) , , writ denied, 99-1048 (La.
Miralda v. Gonzalez 160 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/17/99) , (holding that a fraud claim, while not subject to the three-year peremptive period, remains subject to the one-year period.)).
Raspanti v. Raspanti 977 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Tommie Mack Granger v. J. Ogden Middleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Inc., (the fraud claim, while not subject to the three-year peremptive period, is still subject to the one-year period).
Granger v. Middleton 948 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Inc., (the fraud claim, while not subject to the three-year peremptive period, is still subject to the one-year period).
Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Ernest L. Parker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Inc., (the fraud claim, while not subject to the three-year peremptive period, is still subject to the one-year period).
Marsh Engineering Inc. v. Parker 883 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Inc., (the fraud claim, while not subject to the three-year peremptive period, is still subject to the one-year period).
Fauria v. Dwyer 857 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Richard & Associates, Inc., 98-1167 (3//17/99), , appeal after remand, 99-10 (La.
Saacks v. Mohawk Carpet Corp. 855 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Richard & Associates, Inc., 98-1167 (3// 17/99), , appeal after remand, 99-10 (La.
Robin v. Allstate Ins. Co. 844 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 3/17/99), -86 , writ denied, 99-1048 (La.6/4/99), .
Dauterive Contractors, Inc. v. Landry and Watkins 811 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
App. 3 Cir. 3/17/99); ; Taussig v. Leithead, 96-960 (La.App.
Huffman v. Goodman 784 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Broussard v. Toce 746 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Broussard v. FA RICHARD & ASSOC. 740 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 3/17/99) ; , this court dealt with an issue of prescription in a tort claim asserted by Mr. Broussard's survivors against the attorneys representing West-Cal, Mr. Broussard's employer.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by